Table 2 Results of intergroup consistency and interexpert reliability analysis.
From: The benefits of tourism for rural community development
Indicator | K–W X2 | p | Kendall’s W |
|---|---|---|---|
A. Economic perspective | 0.73 | ||
A1. Investment opportunities | 0.68 | 0.336 | |
A2. Increased income | 1.40 | 0.258 | |
A3. Employment opportunities | 0.87 | 0.308 | |
A4. Employment stability | 0.67 | 0.343 | |
A5. Tax revenue | 2.48 | 0.146 | |
A6. Entrepreneurial opportunities | 1.68 | 0.216 | |
A7. Economic resilience | 1.22 | 0.234 | |
A8. Product diversification | 2.05 | 0.128 | |
A9. Business viability | 2.76 | 0.092 | |
B. Sociocultural perspective | 0.71 | ||
B1. Quality of life & well-being | 0.87 | 0.312 | |
B2. Depopulation | 0.78 | 0.328 | |
B3. Social stability | 0.53 | 0.364 | |
B4. Culture & heritage preservation | 0.84 | 0.325 | |
B5. Restoration of historical buildings | 1.57 | 0.128 | |
B6. Community identity | 0.82 | 0.312 | |
B7. Community pride | 2.06 | 0.118 | |
B8. Community visibility | 1.76 | 0.106 | |
B9. Cultural integrity | 2.56 | 0.095 | |
C. Environmental perspective | 0.71 | ||
C1. Natural environmental conservation | 1.58 | 0.131 | |
C2. Biodiversity | 0.82 | 0.292 | |
C3. Infrastructure | 1.76 | 0.106 | |
C4. Green chemistry | 0.78 | 0.328 | |
C5. Kept land unspoiled | 1.22 | 0.234 | |
C6. Kept land in family | 0.64 | 0.355 | |
C7. Environmental awareness | 2.35 | 0.094 | |
D. Leisure and educational perspective | 0.72 | ||
D1. Ecological knowledge | 1.78 | 0.098 | |
D2. Green consumerism | 1.13 | 0.218 | |
D3. Technology skills and capabilities | 0.68 | 0.336 | |
D4. Leisure & recreational opportunities | 0.64 | 0.356 | |
D5. Health & food security | 1.04 | 0.234 | |
D6. Reducing mental health issues | 0.75 | 0.340 | |
D7. Nostalgia nurturing | 1.42 | 0.154 |
