Table 3 Analysis results of the IPA questions.

From: An importance-performance analysis of teachers’ perception of STEM engineering design education

Aspects/Questions

Mean (SD)

IPA quadrant/category

Importance

Performance

The perception of STEM-ED itself

4.45(0.53)

4.32(0.59)

 

1. Promoting STEM-ED to students’ interest and future talents in STEM fields.

4.61(0.49)

4.29(0.76)

II/C

2. Recommendation of STEM-ED to colleagues.

4.42(0.73)

4.40(0.73)

IV/P

3. Implementation of STEM-ED courses in teaching.

4.33(0.71)

4.26(0.74)

III/L

The impact of STEM-ED on students

4.36(0.46)

4.27(0.63)

 

4. Students’ critical thinking.

4.42(0.50)

4.28(0.77)

I/K

5. Students’ creativity.

4.56(0.59)

4.37(0.74)

I/K

6. Students’ personal traits.

4.09(0.68)

4.09(0.80)

III/L

7. Students’ choices in STEM disciplines.

4.37(0.58)

4.28(0.77)

I/K

Challenges in implementing STEM-ED

4.68(0.32)

3.75(0.66)

 

8. Support of administration and finance.

4.85(0.36)

3.87(0.94)

I/K

9. Readiness of STEM-ED lessons.

4.75(0.48)

3.76(0.87)

II/C

10. Workload

4.57(0.50)

3.68(0.88)

III/L

11. Use of new equipment and media.

4.59(0.55)

3.67(0.94)

III/L

Opinions of the STEM-ED empowerment course

4.52(0.40)

4.48(0.49)

 

12. Provision of empowerment training in STEM-ED teaching strategy.

4.62(0.49)

4.49(0.60)

I/K

13. Promotion of empowerment training.

4.53(0.50)

4.58(0.66)

I/K

14. Appropriate content of empowerment training.

4.57(0.50)

4.49(0.65)

I/K

15. Length of empowerment training.

4.35(0.70)

4.36(0.75)

III/L