Table 4 Summary table of the analysis of variance.
From: An importance-performance analysis of teachers’ perception of STEM engineering design education
Aspects | IPA Model | F-value (LSD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age groups taught | Year of teaching | Number of weekly teaching hours | STEM training | ||
The perception of STEM-ED itself | Importance | 1.83 | 0.75 | 0.12 | 0.37 |
Performance | 4.38*(3 < 1) | 1.61 | 0.26 | 0.28 | |
The impact of STEM-ED on students | Importance | 0.43 | 0.60 | 0.35 | 0.14 |
Performance | 1.34 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.12 | |
Challenges in implementing STEM-ED | Importance | 0.09 | 1.51 | 1.30 | 0.20 |
Performance | 0.97 | 0.34 | 4.05*(3 < 1) | 0.54 | |
Opinions of the STEM-ED empowerment course | Importance | 0.49 | 0.85 | 0.44 | 0.27 |
Performance | 4.06*(3 < 1.2) | 1.10 | 0.58 | 0.35 | |
