Table 2 Coefficients and 95% confidence intervals of moderated moderation for predicting scores on Individualizing MFV-Testing the moderating role of Identity × Framing.

From: Moral self-consistency as the self-organization of moral identity: A social-cognitive approach

Model summary

R

R2

MSE

F

df

p

 

0.38

0.14

0.24

8.39

8401

<.001

Model

b

SEb

t

p

LLCI

ULCI

Constant

2.50

0.19

13.00

<0.001

2.12

2.88

Individualizing MFQ

0.26

0.04

7.55

<0.001

0.20

0.33

Framing

0.20

0.33

0.59

0.55

−0.46

0.86

Individualizing MFQ × Framing

−0.03

0.07

−0.42

0.68

−0.16

0.10

Identity

0.32

0.33

0.95

0.34

−0.34

0.97

Individualizing MFQ × Identity

−0.06

0.07

−0.85

0.40

−0.18

0.07

Identity × Framing

1.76

.67

2.63

0.01

0.45

3.07

Individualizing MFQ × Identity × Framing

−0.35

0.13

−2.61

0.01

−0.61

−0.09

Political Identity

0.05

0.01

3.74

<0.001

0.03

0.08

Test of conditional Individualizing MFQ × Identity interaction at Framing values

Framing

Effect

F

df1

df2

p

 

Principles and values

0.12

1.56

1

401

.21

 

Moral integrity

−0.23

5.97

1

401

.02

 
  1. MFV moral foundations vignettes, MFQ moral foundations questionnaire, LLCI lower level of confidence interval, ULCI upper level of confidence interval.