Fig. 1: Area under ROC (left) and PR (right) curves from forecasts of conflict incidence in Africa at different administrative levels: unique predictive power of indicator groups. | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Fig. 1: Area under ROC (left) and PR (right) curves from forecasts of conflict incidence in Africa at different administrative levels: unique predictive power of indicator groups.

From: Extreme weather impacts do not improve conflict predictions in Africa

Fig. 1

The figures show model performances—ROC and PR curve results—of conflict predictions made using a Generalized Random Forest (GRF) algorithm with different indicator groups at different administrative levels from the most aggregate (level 0 is the national level) to the most granular (level 2). The figures highlight the effect of removing each of the four indicator groups—extreme weather events (ewi-red), conflict history (conf-green), socioeconomic indicators (socecon-blue), and governance (gov-gold)—from a predictive model with all of the indicator groups. The difference between a model with all indicator groups and a model with all except one captures the unique information found in that indicator group. Battles from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) are used as an outcome variable.

Back to article page