Fig. 1: Cross-lagged panel structural equation models simultaneously examining peer influence and selection homophily effects, with cross-lagged and auto-regressive effects between focal participant scores and the average scores of their nominated friends between baseline and follow-up. | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Fig. 1: Cross-lagged panel structural equation models simultaneously examining peer influence and selection homophily effects, with cross-lagged and auto-regressive effects between focal participant scores and the average scores of their nominated friends between baseline and follow-up.

From: Selection homophily and peer influence for adolescents’ smoking and vaping norms and outcomes in high and middle-income settings

Fig. 1

Xi, t=base: Focal participant (i) scores on the outcome at baseline. Xi, t=fu: Focal participant (i) scores on the outcome at follow-up. Ave(X)i, t=base: Average of nominated friends’ (−i) scores on the outcome at baseline. Ave(X)i, t=fu: Average of nominated friends’ (-i) scores on the outcome at follow-up. Covi, t=base: Focal participant (i) baseline covariates (gender, age, ethnicity, and socio-economic status). Cross1: Cross-lagged path from Ave(X)i, t=base to Xi, t=fu. This path represents the peer influence effect. Cross2: Cross-lagged path from Xi, t=base to Ave(X)i, t=fu. This path represents the selection homophily effect. Auto1: Auto-regressive path from Xi, t=base to Xi, t=fu. Auto2: Auto-regressive path from Ave(X)i, t=base to Ave(X)i, t=fu. Corr1: Correlation path between Xi, t=base and Ave(X)i, t=base. Corr2: Correlation path between Xi, t=fu and Ave(X)i, t=fu.

Back to article page