Table 5 Results of ordinary least-squares linear regressions showing peer influence effects for focal participant responses to experimentally measured smoking and vaping norms, and other smoking outcomes, at follow-up.

From: Selection homophily and peer influence for adolescents’ smoking and vaping norms and outcomes in high and middle-income settings

Outcomes

Time-point

Outcome variable: Focal participant responses to outcomes at follow-up

(1) −i = Average of nominated friendsa

(1) −i = Average of nominated friendsb

(2) -i = Average of school classa

(3) −i = Average of school year groupa

n

Responsei, t

Responsei, t

n

Response-i, t

n

Responsei, t

b (SE)c

p-value

βd

b (SE)c

p-value

βd

b (SE)c

p-value

βd

b (SE)c

p-value

βd

Experiment Part 2: Injunctive norms for smoking/vaping (−1 = “extremely socially inappropriate” to+1 = “extremely socially appropriate”).

P2S2

t = base

1073

0.34 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1396

0.27 (0.09)

0.003

0.1096

1087

0.44 (0.12)

<0.001h

0.1176

1087

0.78 (0.18)

<0.001h

0.1510

t = fu

1018

0.15 (0.06)

0.02

0.0760

0.08 (0.06)

0.22

0.0399

1087

0.31 (0.10)

0.003

0.0933

1087

0.57 (0.16)

<0.001

0.1199

P2S3

t = base

1072

0.11 (0.07)

0.11

0.0489

0.12 (0.07)

0.09

0.0508

1086

0.17 (0.16)

0.28

0.0357

1086

0.01 (0.28)

0.96

0.0017

t = fu

1017

0.12 (0.07)

0.09

0.0535

0.11 (0.07)

0.09

0.0534

1086

0.21 (0.14)

0.12

0.0523

1086

0.18 (0.25)

0.48

0.0213

P2S4

t = base

1070

0.13 (0.08)

0.09

0.0605

0.13 (0.08)

0.09

0.0601

1084

0.17 (0.12)

0.15

0.0424

1084

0.46 (0.32)

0.15

0.0582

t = fu

1016

0.12 (0.07)

0.08

0.0568

0.09 (0.07)

0.19

0.0424

1084

0.29 (0.11)

0.01

0.0780

1084

0.44 (0.20)

0.03

0.0748

P2S5

t = base

1073

0.19 (0.06)

0.002

0.0918

0.19 (0.06)

0.003

0.0897

1087

0.32 (0.10)

0.001

0.0981

1087

0.48 (0.15)

0.001

0.1028

t = fu

1018

0.17 (0.06)

0.003

0.0902

0.17 (0.06)

0.005

0.0885

1087

0.45 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1629

1087

0.45 (0.14)

0.001

0.1098

P2S6

t = base

1070

0.16 (0.07)

0.02

0.0762

0.16 (0.07)

0.02

0.0753

1084

0.36 (0.11)

0.001

0.1025

1084

0.40 (0.19)

0.03

0.0774

t = fu

1015

0.16 (0.06)

0.007

0.0803

0.15 (0.06)

0.007

0.0797

1084

0.45 (0.10)

<0.001h

0.1417

1084

0.51 (0.15)

0.001

0.0977

P2S7

t = base

1072

0.16 (0.05)

0.003

0.0870

0.16 (0.05)

0.003

0.0861

1086

0.29 (0.09)

0.001

0.1006

1086

0.28 (0.14)

0.04

0.0622

t = fu

1018

0.27 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1474

0.27 (0.06)

<0.001i

0.1471

1086

0.41 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1358

1086

0.31 (0.17)

0.07

0.0630

P2S8

t = base

1073

0.30 (0.05)

<0.001h

0.1578

0.30 (0.05)

<0.001i

0.1589

1087

0.31 (0.09)

<0.001

0.1037

1087

0.45 (0.14)

0.001

0.0940

t = fu

1018

0.23 (0.05)

<0.001h

0.1235

0.23 (0.05)

<0.001i

0.1228

1087

0.47 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1703

1087

0.48 (0.13)

<0.001

0.1083

P2S9

t = base

1072

0.16 (0.07)

0.02

0.0711

0.15 (0.07)

0.02

0.0697

1086

0.51 (0.12)

<0.001h

0.1230

1086

0.56 (0.21)

0.009

0.0767

t = fu

1017

0.24 (0.07)

<0.001

0.1183

0.24 (0.07)

<0.001

0.1176

1086

0.41 (0.11)

<0.001h

0.1226

1086

0.21 (0.20)

0.29

0.0330

Experimental injunctive norms scale (average P2S2–P2S9)

t = base

1064

0.22 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1098

0.23 (0.06)

<0.001i

0.1111

1078

0.35 (0.10)

<0.001

0.1054

1078

0.41 (0.15)

0.005

0.0766

t = fu

1011

0.25 (0.05)

<0.001h

0.1341

0.25 (0.05)

<0.001i

0.1352

1078

0.47 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1707

1078

0.30 (0.14)

0.03

0.0620

Experiment Part 3: Descriptive norms for smoking/vaping (−1 = “none of my peers” to +1 = “all of my peers”).

P3Q1

t = base

1073

0.09 (0.06)

0.15

0.0451

0.10 (0.06)

0.11

0.0503

1087

0.24 (0.11)

0.03

0.0723

1087

0.15 (0.15)

0.33

0.0323

t = fu

1018

0.09 (0.06)

0.14

0.0466

0.09 (0.06)

0.14

0.0462

1087

0.30 (0.10)

0.004

0.0902

1087

0.20 (0.17)

0.25

0.0354

P3Q2

t = base

1073

0.19 (0.05)

<0.001

0.1017

0.20 (0.05)

<0.001

0.1033

1087

0.31 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1187

1087

0.32 (0.11)

0.003

0.0927

t = fu

1018

0.18 (0.06)

0.001

0.0942

0.18 (0.06)

0.002

0.0926

1087

0.30 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1105

1087

0.28 (0.12)

0.02

0.0695

Experimental descriptive norms scale (average P3Q1–P3Q2)

t = base

1073

0.15 (0.06)

0.01

0.0764

0.16 (0.06)

0.007

0.0813

1087

0.26 (0.09)

0.003

0.0923

1087

0.20 (0.11)

0.08

0.0544

t = fu

1018

0.13 (0.06)

0.03

0.0642

0.13 (0.06)

0.03

0.0646

1087

0.28 (0.09)

0.002

0.0938

1087

0.17 (0.13)

0.19

0.0383

Experiment Part 4: Willingness to pay to support anti-smoking norms (Donations to ASSIST/Dead Cool; 0 = “0 tokens donated” to 10 = “10 tokens donated”).

Donation to ASSIST/Dead Cool

t = base

1071

0.14 (0.06)

0.02

0.0740

0.12 (0.06)

0.03

0.0658

1085

0.15 (0.09)

0.12

0.0505

1085

0.26 (0.20)

0.20

0.0437

t = fu

1016

0.34 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1877

0.32 (0.06)

<0.001i

0.1754

1085

0.48 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1604

1085

0.66 (0.14)

<0.001h

0.1494

Self-report injunctive smoking norms (−2 = “think(s) that I definitely should smoke” to+2 = “think(s) that I definitely should not smoke”).

IN1

t = base

1073

−0.04 (0.06)

0.51

−0.0173

−0.04 (0.07)

0.60

−0.0153

1082

0.05 (0.13)

0.72

0.0105

1082

0.36 (0.22)

0.09

0.0463

t = fu

1070

0.07 (0.06)

0.27

0.0311

0.06 (0.06)

0.31

0.0288

1082

−0.17 (0.12)

0.16

−0.0378

1082

0.23 (0.23)

0.32

0.0326

IN2

t = base

1075

−0.02 (0.08)

0.80

−0.0061

−0.02 (0.08)

0.76

−0.0075

1084

0.20 (0.19)

0.28

0.0422

1084

0.23 (0.56)

0.68

0.0200

t = fu

1072

0.14 (0.08)

0.07

0.0627

0.14 (0.08)

0.07

0.0602

1084

0.12 (0.11)

0.25

0.0308

1084

0.08 (0.27)

0.77

0.0095

IN3

t = base

1073

0.11 (0.07)

0.09

0.0513

0.11 (0.07)

0.11

0.0496

1082

0.18 (0.11)

0.13

0.0425

1082

0.26 (0.19)

0.16

0.0473

t = fu

1070

0.08 (0.05)

0.13

0.0387

0.08 (0.05)

0.17

0.0358

1082

0.003 (0.10)

0.98

0.0007

1082

0.12 (0.20)

0.54

0.0184

IN4

t = base

1071

0.03 (0.06)

0.60

0.0134

0.03 (0.06)

0.55

0.0151

1081

−0.02 (0.13)

0.85

−0.0050

1081

0.69 (0.32)

0.03

0.0730

t = fu

1069

0.06 (0.05)

0.28

0.0277

0.04 (0.05)

0.45

0.0194

1081

0.18 (0.12)

0.13

0.0396

1081

0.41 (0.22)

0.06

0.0567

IN5

t = base

1073

−0.01 (0.06)

0.83

−0.0055

0.005 (0.06)

0.93

0.0023

1082

−0.05 (0.11)

0.66

−0.0123

1082

−0.01 (0.23)

0.95

−0.0017

t = fu

1070

0.03 (0.06)

0.58

0.0142

0.03 (0.06)

0.59

0.0140

1082

0.04 (0.11)

0.74

0.0088

1082

0.09 (0.20)

0.66

0.0120

IN6

t = base

1074

0.21 (0.06)

<0.001

0.1013

0.19 (0.06)

0.001

0.0909

1083

0.20 (0.10)

0.05

0.0570

1083

0.44 (0.16)

0.007

0.0824

t = fu

1071

0.25 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1256

0.22 (0.06)

<0.001i

0.1129

1083

0.27 (0.09)

0.003

0.0794

1083

0.41 (0.16)

0.01

0.0801

IN7

t = base

1075

0.11 (0.06)

0.06

0.0537

0.09 (0.06)

0.14

0.0431

1084

0.21 (0.12)

0.07

0.0556

1084

0.57 (0.18)

0.002

0.0996

t = fu

1072

0.19 (0.06)

0.003

0.0944

0.17 (0.06)

0.007

0.0866

1084

0.21 (0.11)

0.06

0.0572

1084

0.34 (0.18)

0.06

0.0644

Self-report injunctive norms scale (average IN1–IN7)

t = base

1068

0.07 (0.06)

0.23

0.0310

0.07 (0.06)

0.25

0.0288

1078

0.06 (0.12)

0.63

0.0145

1078

0.38 (0.18)

0.04

0.0634

t = fu

1066

0.19 (0.05)

<0.001

0.0936

0.19 (0.05)

<0.001

0.0923

1078

0.20 (0.09)

0.03

0.0534

1078

0.24 (0.16)

0.13

0.0426

Self-report descriptive smoking norms (DN1: 1 = “smoke(s) very often” to 5 = “never smoke(s)”/“don’t know”; DN2: 1 = “almost all of them smoke” to 5 = “almost none of them smoke”/“don’t know”).

DN1.1

t = base

1075

0.30 (0.10)

0.005

0.1340

0.28 (0.10)

0.008

0.1274

1084

0.30 (0.14)

0.04

0.0842

1084

1.06 (0.30)

0.001

0.1793

t = fu

1072

0.33 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1702

0.31 (0.09)

<0.001

0.1632

1084

0.24 (0.13)

0.06

0.0703

1084

0.62 (0.18)

0.001

0.1384

DN1.2

t = base

1076

0.13 (0.05)

0.007

0.0665

0.12 (0.05)

0.01

0.0636

1085

0.08 (0.07)

0.24

0.0279

1085

0.16 (0.09)

0.06

0.0434

t = fu

1073

−0.005 (0.04)

0.91

−0.0028

−0.02 (0.05)

0.71

−0.0092

1085

0.02 (0.08)

0.76

0.0073

1085

0.11 (0.09)

0.23

0.0266

DN1.3

t = base

1075

0.08 (0.04)

0.06

0.0399

0.08 (0.04)

0.07

0.0386

1084

0.06 (0.08)

0.45

0.0172

1084

0.13 (0.13)

0.30

0.0273

t = fu

1072

0.02 (0.05)

0.64

0.0113

0.02 (0.05)

0.71

0.0089

1084

0.03 (0.08)

0.74

0.0072

1084

0.08 (0.14)

0.59

0.0142

DN1.4

t = base

1075

0.01 (0.04)

0.81

0.0047

0.01 (0.04)

0.79

0.0053

1084

0.07 (0.13)

0.59

0.0165

1084

0.11 (0.14)

0.43

0.0173

t = fu

1072

−0.09 (0.04)

0.03

−0.0417

−0.09 (0.04)

0.04

−0.0414

1084

0.10 (0.15)

0.50

0.0253

1084

−0.10 (0.17)

0.56

−0.0134

DN1.5

t = base

1075

0.08 (0.05)

0.13

0.0300

0.07 (0.05)

0.15

0.0294

1084

0.16 (0.12)

0.16

0.0357

1084

0.29 (0.19)

0.13

0.0291

t = fu

1072

−0.01 (0.05)

0.81

−0.0048

−0.01 (0.05)

0.81

−0.0049

1084

0.18 (0.11)

0.10

0.0453

1084

0.09 (0.16)

0.58

0.0116

Self-report descriptive norms scale 1 (average DN1.1–DN1.5)

t = base

1073

0.09 (0.05)

0.06

0.0460

0.09 (0.05)

0.07

0.0438

1082

0.05 (0.07)

0.47

0.0181

1082

0.18 (0.10)

0.09

0.0474

t = fu

1070

0.04 (0.05)

0.41

0.0201

0.03 (0.05)

0.49

0.0168

1082

0.02 (0.07)

0.80

0.0062

1082

0.14 (0.10)

0.16

0.0380

DN2.1

t = base

1076

0.17 (0.07)

0.02

0.0774

0.16 (0.07)

0.03

0.0729

1085

0.17 (0.11)

0.11

0.0515

1085

0.21 (0.15)

0.14

0.0464

t = fu

1073

0.19 (0.07)

0.005

0.1012

0.18 (0.07)

0.007

0.0961

1085

0.19 (0.11)

0.10

0.0584

1085

0.12 (0.16)

0.46

0.0246

DN2.2

t = base

1076

0.17 (0.06)

0.006

0.0784

0.14 (0.06)

0.03

0.0656

1085

0.30 (0.10)

0.002

0.0955

1085

0.48 (0.16)

0.003

0.0994

t = fu

1073

0.11 (0.06)

0.07

0.0556

0.08 (0.06)

0.17

0.0431

1085

0.17 (0.09)

0.07

0.0526

1085

0.38 (0.15)

0.01

0.0827

DN2.3

t = base

1076

0.26 (0.07)

<0.001

0.1278

0.25 (0.08)

0.001

0.1189

1085

0.57 (0.10)

<0.001h

0.1910

1085

0.65 (0.13)

<0.001h

0.1703

t = fu

1073

0.18 (0.06)

0.002

0.1076

0.16 (0.06)

0.01

0.0930

1085

0.39 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1525

1085

0.53 (0.11)

<0.001h

0.1633

Self-report descriptive norms scale 2 (average DN2.1-DN2.3)

t = base

1076

0.22 (0.07)

0.001

0.1025

0.19 (0.07)

0.005

0.0903

1085

0.37 (0.10)

<0.001h

0.1250

1085

0.45 (0.13)

0.001

0.1151

t = fu

1073

0.11 (0.06)

0.06

0.0624

0.08 (0.06)

0.18

0.0455

1085

0.25 (0.08)

0.003

0.0936

1085

0.36 (0.12)

0.003

0.1014

Survey questions about smoking behavior, intentions, knowledge, attitudes, and psycho-social antecedents, and objectively measured smoking behaviore

Self-report smoking behavior (1–4)

t = base

1083

0.16 (0.07)

0.03

0.0726

0.16 (0.07)

0.03

0.0719

1093

0.22 (0.11)

0.04

0.0557

1093

0.55 (0.16)

0.001

0.0920

t = fu

1081

0.24 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1342

0.24 (0.07)

<0.001i

0.1344

1093

0.22 (0.08)

0.01

0.0691

1093

0.38 (0.10)

<0.001h

0.0885

Intentions (1–6)

t = base

1078

0.17 (0.08)

0.04

0.0630

0.15 (0.08)

0.07

0.0561

1087

0.48 (0.14)

<0.001

0.1078

1087

0.96 (0.24)

<0.001h

0.1184

t = fu

1075

0.21 (0.08)

0.005

0.1160

0.20 (0.08)

0.01

0.1095

1087

0.11 (0.11)

0.32

0.0310

1087

0.38 (0.14)

0.007

0.0811

Knowledge (0–6)

t = base

1080

0.20 (0.05)

<0.001

0.1001

0.12 (0.06)

0.04

0.0621

1089

0.41 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1616

1089

0.45 (0.10)

<0.001h

0.1366

t = fu

1077

0.29 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1568

0.24 (0.06)

<0.001i

0.1329

1089

0.41 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1773

1089

0.42 (0.11)

<0.001h

0.1362

Attitudes (1–5)

t = base

1067

0.16 (0.06)

0.007

0.0763

0.16 (0.06)

0.007

0.0763

1076

−0.04 (0.11)

0.73

−0.0095

1076

0.34 (0.21)

0.10

0.0501

t = fu

1064

0.17 (0.06)

0.009

0.0844

0.17 (0.07)

0.009

0.0847

1076

−0.10 (0.12)

0.41

−0.0246

1076

0.23 (0.17)

0.17

0.0417

Self-efficacy (Emotional; 1–6)

t = base

1072

0.11 (0.07)

0.13

0.0484

0.10 (0.07)

0.19

0.0414

1081

0.30 (0.12)

0.01

0.0735

1081

0.46 (0.17)

0.005

0.0797

t = fu

1068

0.29 (0.07)

<0.001h

0.1505

0.26 (0.07)

<0.001

0.1355

1081

0.22 (0.09)

0.02

0.0629

1081

0.42 (0.13)

0.001

0.0913

Self-efficacy (Friends; 1–6)

t = base

1078

0.06 (0.06)

0.33

0.0272

0.06 (0.06)

0.35

0.0256

1087

0.20 (0.11)

0.08

0.0495

1087

0.18 (0.17)

0.29

0.0294

t = fu

1075

0.20 (0.07)

0.003

0.0992

0.18 (0.07)

0.006

0.0919

1087

0.11 (0.10)

0.27

0.0286

1087

0.27 (0.18)

0.13

0.0455

Self-efficacy (Opportunity; 1–6)

t = base

1079

0.13 (0.07)

0.07

0.0506

0.11 (0.07)

0.10

0.0441

1088

0.38 (0.14)

0.006

0.0847

1088

0.42 (0.20)

0.04

0.0646

t = fu

1076

0.17 (0.07)

0.02

0.0846

0.14 (0.07)

0.04

0.0738

1088

0.21 (0.10)

0.04

0.0588

1088

0.29 (0.17)

0.08

0.0539

Perceived physical risks (0–100%)

t = base

1074

0.07 (0.05)

0.18

0.0387

0.07 (0.05)

0.21

0.0361

1082

0.15 (0.09)

0.09

0.0470

1082

0.07 (0.14)

0.61

0.0141

t = fu

1070

0.12 (0.05)

0.03

0.0604

0.11 (0.05)

0.04

0.0571

1082

0.11 (0.11)

0.32

0.0312

1082

−0.15 (0.21)

0.48

−0.0238

Perceived social risks (0–100%)

t = base

1076

0.15 (0.05)

0.003

0.0865

0.08 (0.06)

0.18

0.0421

1085

0.27 (0.07)

<0.001h

0.1070

1085

0.40 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1248

t = fu

1073

0.13 (0.06)

0.02

0.0711

0.06 (0.06)

0.36

0.0318

1085

0.24 (0.08)

0.005

0.0831

1085

0.40 (0.12)

0.001

0.1113

Perceived addiction risks (0–100%)

t = base

1016

0.23 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1188

0.05 (0.07)

0.45

0.0260

1025

0.51 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.1870

1025

0.71 (0.10)

<0.001h

0.2253

t = fu

1009

0.14 (0.05)

0.004

0.0833

−0.06 (0.06)

0.33

−0.0328

1025

0.39 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1594

1025

0.58 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.2073

Perceived benefits (0–100%)

t = base

1029

−0.04 (0.06)

0.46

−0.0208

−0.04 (0.06)

0.47

−0.0207

1038

0.08 (0.12)

0.48

0.0198

1038

0.34 (0.20)

0.10

0.0474

t = fu

1025

0.03 (0.06)

0.62

0.0137

0.03 (0.06)

0.62

0.0137

1038

−0.08 (0.12)

0.50

−0.0192

1038

−0.15 (0.25)

0.55

−0.0175

PBC (easy to quit; 1–5)

t = base

1076

0.27 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.1457

0.03 (0.07)

0.63

0.0185

1085

0.50 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.1987

1085

0.68 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.2347

t = fu

1073

0.17 (0.06)

0.003

0.0970

−0.10 (0.07)

0.14

−0.0580

1085

0.50 (0.08)

<0.001h

0.2046

1085

0.60 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.2177

PBC (to avoid smoking; 1–5)

t = base

1080

0.06 (0.07)

0.37

0.0283

0.01 (0.07)

0.92

0.0034

1089

0.36 (0.13)

0.008

0.0875

1089

0.77 (0.22)

<0.001

0.1259

t = fu

1077

0.09 (0.07)

0.20

0.0426

0.01 (0.07)

0.84

0.0071

1089

0.12 (0.13)

0.39

0.0304

1089

0.53 (0.18)

0.003

0.1036

Objectively measured smoking behavior (0–30)

t = base

1041

0.37 (0.05)

<0.001h

0.2707

0.07 (0.07)f

0.32

0.0484

1048

0.38 (0.05)

<0.001h

0.2634

1048

0.59 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.3702

t = fu

1022

0.48 (0.09)

<0.001h

0.3852

0.39 (0.09)

<0.001i

0.3103

1048

0.84 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.5470

1048

0.87 (0.06)

<0.001h

0.5078

Smoking susceptibility (binary)g

 

n

OR (SE)

p-value

OR (SE)

p-value

n

OR (SE)

p-value

n

OR (SE)

p-value

t = base

1078

1.14 (0.04)

<0.001h

1.12 (0.04)

<0.001

1087

1.10 (0.07)

0.12

1087

1.21 (0.12)

0.05

t = fu

1075

1.14 (0.03)

<0.001h

1.11 (0.03)

0.001

1087

1.17 (0.06)

0.004

1087

1.31 (0.10)

<0.001

  1. aIn each model the outcome variable is the focal participant’s (i) response to the relevant item at follow-up. The predictor variable is the average of the relevant peer group’s (-i) responses to the equivalent item at baseline (t = base) or follow-up (t = fu), where –i = (1) focal participant’s nominated friends; (2) focal participant’s school class; (3) focal participant’s school year group. All models include robust (Huber–White) standard errors specified using Stata’s ‘vce(robust)’ option. The following baseline variables are included as covariates in all models: Gender (0 = boy; 1 = girl/prefer not to say), Age (1 = 12 years or less; 2 = 13 years; 3 = 14 years or more), Intervention (1 = ASSIST; 2 = Dead Cool), Ethnicity (0 = no ethnic minority; 1 = ethnic minority), Socio-economic status (NI: 1 = NIMDM2017 ≤ 296.6; 2 = 296.6 < NIMDM2017 ≤ 593.2; 3 = NIMDM2017 > 593.2; Bogotá: 1 = Informal settlement/Lowest/Low; 2 = Middle-Low/Middle; 3 = Middle-High/High), and baseline values of the outcome variable.
  2. bResults of models adjusted for Setting (0 = Northern Ireland; 1 = Bogotá). Baseline variables included as covariates in all models are: Gender, Age, Intervention, Ethnicity, Socio-economic status, baseline values of the outcome variable, and Setting. Results are reported for –i = (1) focal participant’s nominated friends.
  3. cUnstandardized regression coefficients representing the average change in i’s response category to the relevant question at follow-up for a one-unit increase in the average of –i’s responses to the equivalent item at baseline (t = base) or follow-up (t = fu), holding other variables constant.
  4. dStandardized regression coefficients representing the standard deviation change in the outcome variable, for a one standard deviation increase in the predictor variable.
  5. eHigher numerical values represent higher self-report anti-smoking outcomes, apart from objectively measured smoking behavior (higher numerical values represent higher levels of smoking behavior).
  6. fFor the model including focal participants’ carbon monoxide readings at follow-up as the outcome variable, and average carbon monoxide readings for nominated friends at baseline as the predictor variable, variance inflation factors were 3.00 for Setting and 3.02 for the predictor variable when the model was adjusted for Setting.
  7. gLogistic regressions were run for models including focal participants’ smoking susceptibility as the outcome variable, with robust (Huber White) standard errors specified using Stata’s ‘vce(robust)’ option. Results are odds ratios, standard errors, and p-values. Odds ratios represent the multiplicative change in odds of being susceptible to commencing smoking for a 10% increase in the number of nominated friends/pupils in the same school class/pupils in the same school year group classified as being susceptible to commencing smoking (1 out of 10 nominated friends/pupils in the same school class/pupils in the same school year group).
  8. hRetained statistical significance at the 5% level after using the Holm–Bonferroni procedure to correct the p-values for multiple testing (p ≤ 0.05; based on all tests reported in Table 5, excluding results of models which were repeated to adjust for Setting).
  9. iIndicates where the p-value in models examining peer influence effects from the average responses of nominated friends still met the Holm–Bonferroni threshold when the model was additionally adjusted for Setting (p ≤ 0.05).
  10. Bold values show the results meeting the significance level of p ≤ 0.01.