Table 6 College Students’ Purchase Intention Pattern Evaluation Results.

From: College students’ potential purchase intention of electric two-wheeled vehicles

Variables

Logistic Regression Model

Ordered Logit Model

Items

Coefficient

t value

Coefficient

t value

Constants

−4.56

−9.32**

-

-

Weekly fuel expenses for regular scooters

  

0.003

2.52**

Age

-

-

0.06

1.73*

Number of people in each household

-

-

−0.14

−1.98**

ETWVs are too expensive

−0.46

−2.43**

-

-

ETWVs have poor endurance

−0.49

−2.61**

-

-

ETWVs rebate

-

-

1.06

4.79**

ETWVs are reasonably priced

1.33

2.29**

-

-

Exemption of fuel tax/vehicle license tax

0.93

3.15**

0.51

2.29**

Outstanding performances (horsepower and distance)

-

-

0.53

1.88*

I am willing to try or continue to use ETWVs

0.81

7.70**

0.28

3.58**

Good value for the price of ETWVs

0.64

6.01**

0.16

2.03**

ETWVs can improve the quality of outdoor activities

-

-

0.16

1.93*

Those who are male, have high household income, and are willing to spend more money to purchase ETWVs for environmental reasons

-

-

0.65

3.06**

Those who are male, have high household income, and regard ETWVs as their first choice when purchasing a vehicle in the future

2.63

2.5**

-

-

Threshold value 1

-

5.73

3.16**

Threshold value 2

-

6.03

3.48**

Threshold value 3

-

7.21

4.66**

Threshold value 4

-

9.31

6.59**

LL(ο)

−557.75

−1168.63

LL(β)

−399.17

−1061.85

Pseudo R2

0.28

0.09

  1. Note: * Significant level 10%; ** Significant level 5%.