Table 8 Result of Elasticity Analysis.
From: College students’ potential purchase intention of electric two-wheeled vehicles
Variables | Logistic Regression Model | Ordered Logit Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Neutral | Partially agree | Strongly agree | ||
ETWVs are too expensive | −0.06 | — | — | — |
ETWVs have poor endurance | −0.08 | |||
ETWVs are reasonably priced | 0.03 | |||
Exemption of fuel tax/vehicle license tax | 0.08 | |||
I am willing to try or continue to use ETWVs | 1.19 | |||
Good value for the price of ETWVs | 0.82 | |||
Those who are male, have high household income, and regard ETWVs as their first choice when purchasing a vehicle in the future | 0.07 | |||
Weekly fuel expenses for regular scooters | — | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.31 |
Students’ age | 0.05 | 0.74 | 1.19 | |
Number of people in each household | −0.03 | −0.36 | −0.58 | |
ETWVs rebate | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.23 | |
Exemption of fuel tax/vehicle license tax | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.09 | |
Outstanding performances (horsepower and distance) | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |
I am willing to try or continue to use ETWVs | 0.04 | 0.56 | 0.90 | |
Good value for the price of ETWVs | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.45 | |
ETWVs can improve the quality of outdoor activities | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.51 | |
Those who are male, have high household income, and are willing to spend more money to purchase ETWVs for environmental reasons | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.07 | |
