Table 4 Study 2 regression results.

From: How does humble leadership influence employee improvisation? A motivational perspective

Variable

IMP

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

M6

Gender

0.11

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

Age

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.02

Education

0.19*

0.009

0.01

0.001

−0.02

−0.03

HUM

 

0.75***

0.75***

0.70***

0.50***

0.35***

POW

  

−0.08

−0.007

−0.04

−0.05

HUM × POW

   

−0.19***

−0.17***

−0.12*

LMX

    

0.26**

0.12

POS

     

0.36*

R2

0.05

0.57

0.58

0.60

0.62

0.66

△R2

0.05

0.52

0.01

0.02

0.02

0.04

△F

4.03*

256.41***

3.07

13.90***

10.69**

22.46**

  1. n = 217.
  2. IMP improvisation, HUM humble leadership, POW power distance orientation, LMX leader–member exchange, POS positive emotion.
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Back to article page