Table 6 Study 2 PROCESS results.

From: How does humble leadership influence employee improvisation? A motivational perspective

Indirect effect

Coefficient

95%CI

HUM → LMX → IMP

0.10(0.08)

[−0.04,0.23]

HUM → POS → IMP

0.16***(0.04)

[0.10,0.24]

HUM → LMX → POS → IMP

0.12** (0.05)

[0.05,0.20]

  1. n = 217. 95% confidence interval. Bootstrap sample size = 5000.
  2. IMP improvisation, HUM humble leadership, LMX leader–member exchange, POS positive emotion.
  3. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Back to article page