Table 1 Constructs measured, original instruments, adaptations, and answer scale.

From: Ambivalence and transnational intergenerational solidarity: the perspective of highly educated Portuguese women emigrant daughters

Construct of measurement

Original instrument and adaptation

Question-wording examples

Answer scale and meaning

Intergenerational solidarity dimensions:

Multidimensional scale by Cavallotti, Grau-Grau, Marimon and Gas-Aixendri (2017)

 

5-point Likert scale (Higher levels of solidarity are expressed by higher index scores)

1. Normative

(11 items;  = 0.80)a

(e.g., Adult children should provide companionship or spend time with elderly parents who are in need)

“totally unimportant” to “totally important”

2. Associational

(7 items;  = 0.88)a

(e.g., We often attend religious activities)

“totally unimportant” to “totally important”

3. Affectual

(4 items;  = 0.72)a

(e.g., How much affection for your parents?)

“very low” to “very high”

4. Consensual

(4 items;  = 0.68)a

(e.g., Do you identify yourself with the ethical principles that your parents have transmitted to you?)

“very low” to “very high”

5. Functional

(2 items;  = 0.70)a

(e.g., Have you received more than 1.000 euros from your parents in the past 12 months?)

“very low” to “very high”

6. Systematic

(5 items;  = 0.60)a

(e.g., When there are conflicts among family members, do you try to facilitate reconciliation?)

“very low” to “very high”

Psychological ambivalence

A shortened version of an instrument comprising 9 items measuring conflicting emotions, motives, and behaviors

(Michels et al., 2011)

( = 0.85)

(e.g., On the one hand I have the feeling that my mother/father is proud of me, but on the other hand she/he always wants to change me)

7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 “totally disagree” to 7 “totally agree”b;c

Adaptation

12 items adapted from the Brief Sociocultural Adaptation Scale (BSAS, Demes & Geeraert, 2014)

( = 0.80)

(e.g., I’m comfortable with the climate of my host country (temperature, rainfall, humidity))

7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 “totally disagree” to 7 “totally agree”c

Acculturation orientation

6 items adapted from the Brief Acculturation Orientation Scale (BAOS, Demes & Geeraert, 2014)

( = 0.61)

(e.g., I have friends in my host country)

7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 “totally disagree” to 7 “totally agree”c

Social cohesion

5 items adapted from Boreham et al. (2013)

( = 0.79)

(e.g., People around here are willing to help their neighbors)

7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 “totally disagree” to 7 “totally agree”c;d

Perceived satisfaction with social connections

4 items adapted from the World Values Survey

(Inglehart and Welzel, 2005)

( = 0.85)

(e.g., I spend time socially with work colleagues)

7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 “totally disagree” to 7 “totally agree”c

Socio-demographic variables

Age, gender, partner status (single, cohabiting, married, widowed, divorced), educational level (from primary education to higher education), activity status (student, employed, unemployed, inactive, retired), host country, length of residence, rural-suburban-urban context.

  1. aCronbach alpha showed satisfactory to good internal consistency levels.
  2. bInstead of a 6-point Likert-type scale, an additional intermediate point was included to improve sensitivity of measurement and find finer gradations of judgment (Kite & Whitely, 2018).
  3. cHigher scores represent higher levels of the respective construct.
  4. dOne item was reverse-coded (people in this neighborhood generally do not get along).