Table 13 Heterogeneity results.

From: The impact of rural living environment improvement programs on the subjective well-being of rural residents in China

Rural residents’ SWB

Region heterogeneity

Age heterogeneity

Education heterogeneity

Working status heterogeneity

Eastern

Midwestern

Northeastern

Junior and old-aged people

Young and middle-aged people

Low-educated

High-educated

Working

Non-working

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

LnRLEI

0.164 (0.209)

0.660** (0.331)

0.121* (0.072)

0.588* (0.330)

0.222 (0.203)

0.164*** (0.053)

0.270 (0.180)

0.329* (0.174)

0.284* (0.170)

Control variables

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pseudo R2

0.015

0.024

0.011

0.037

0.012

0.054

0.013

0.010

0.197

Observations

1458

1442

845

816

2930

401

3346

2179

569

Villagedummy variable

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Year dummy variable

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.
Back to article page