Table 7 The impact of three types of RLEI programs on rural residents’ SWB.
Variables | Coefficients | Marginal effects | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very unhappy | Relatively unhappy | So-so | Relatively happy | Very happy | ||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
Rural sewage | 0.145** (0.064) | −0.006** (0.002) | −0.011** (0.005) | −0.029** (0.013) | 0.012** (0.006) | 0.033** (0.015) | ||
Household income | 0.116*** (0.018) | −0.004*** (0.001) | −0.009*** (0.001) | −0.023*** (0.003) | 0.010*** (0.002) | 0.026*** (0.004) | ||
Rural waste | 0.388*** (0.088) | −0.015*** (0.004) | −0.029*** (0.007) | −0.077*** (0.017) | 0.033*** (0.007) | 0.088*** (0.019) | ||
Household income | 0.110*** (0.018) | −0.004*** (0.001) | −0.008*** (0.001) | −0.022*** (0.003) | 0.009*** (0.002) | 0.025*** (0.004) | ||
Livestock manure | 0.125* (0.072) | −0.005* (0.003) | −0.010* (0.006) | −0.025* (0.014) | 0.011* (0.006) | 0.029* (0.016) | ||
Household income | 0.117*** (0.018) | −0.004*** (0.001) | −0.009*** (0.001) | −0.023*** (0.003) | 0.010*** (0.002) | 0.027*** (0.004) | ||
Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes | – | – | – | – | – |
Observations | 3604 | 3700 | 2906 | – | – | – | – | – |
Village dummy variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | – | – | – | – | – |
Year dummy variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | – | – | – | – | – |