Table 7 The impact of three types of RLEI programs on rural residents’ SWB.

From: The impact of rural living environment improvement programs on the subjective well-being of rural residents in China

Variables

Coefficients

  

Marginal effects

Very unhappy

Relatively unhappy

So-so

Relatively happy

Very happy

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

Rural sewage

0.145** (0.064)

  

−0.006** (0.002)

−0.011** (0.005)

−0.029** (0.013)

0.012** (0.006)

0.033** (0.015)

Household income

0.116*** (0.018)

  

−0.004*** (0.001)

−0.009*** (0.001)

−0.023*** (0.003)

0.010*** (0.002)

0.026*** (0.004)

Rural waste

 

0.388*** (0.088)

 

−0.015*** (0.004)

−0.029*** (0.007)

−0.077*** (0.017)

0.033*** (0.007)

0.088*** (0.019)

Household income

 

0.110*** (0.018)

 

−0.004*** (0.001)

−0.008*** (0.001)

−0.022*** (0.003)

0.009*** (0.002)

0.025*** (0.004)

Livestock manure

  

0.125* (0.072)

−0.005* (0.003)

−0.010* (0.006)

−0.025* (0.014)

0.011* (0.006)

0.029* (0.016)

Household income

  

0.117*** (0.018)

−0.004*** (0.001)

−0.009*** (0.001)

−0.023*** (0.003)

0.010*** (0.002)

0.027*** (0.004)

Control variables

Yes

Yes

Yes

Observations

3604

3700

2906

Village dummy variable

Yes

Yes

Yes

Year dummy variable

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Robust standard errors are reported in coefficients’ parentheses. Delt-method standard errors are reported in marginal effects’ parentheses. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.