Table 1 Geographic subject mind map drawing standards.

From: Fostering students’ geographical synthetic thinking using geographic subject mind maps

Primary Indicator

Secondary Indicator

Requirements (Ideal Standard)

Q:Question

Q1 Question Description

Clearly, state the geographic question to be analysed

F: Factor

F1 Factor Angle

Analyse the issue from a factor perspective based on the situation in the question.

 

F2 Representation of Factor System

Analyse the issue systematically from the perspectives of natural and human factors in the situation in the question.

 

F3 Representation of Dominant Factors

Identify and list factors closely related to the problem, i.e., dominant factors, and analyse them based on this list.

 

F4 Connection between Factors and Regions

Place factor analysis in the corresponding regions, or use lines or other methods to connect factors with regions.

 

F5 Characterization of Factor interactions

If there is a relationship between factors, use unidirectional or bidirectional arrows (or brief text) to indicate factor interactions.

T: Time

T1 Static Time

Write down the time point(s) or static period(s) involved in the issue.

 

T2 Expression of Temporal Changes in Geographical Phenomena or Influencing Factors

Determine whether geographic events or factors change over time in the problem; if not, just mention the time point, but if yes, use words/signs/timelines (nodes) to describe the changes.

S: Space

S1 Text of Regional Names

Write down the locations or regions involved in the geographic problem, phenomenon, or factor.

 

S2 Indication of Multiple Regions

Determine whether the issue involves a single or multiple regions (consider whether dividing larger regions into smaller ones is necessary) and list all involved regions if there are multiple.

 

S3 Characterization of Regional Differentiation

If multiple regions are compared, recognize or analyse regional differences from the perspective of regional differentiation (the differences between factors in different regions).

 

S4 Representation of Intraregional Synthetic (Holistic) Characteristics

If it is necessary to analyse the integrity of the region, analyse and understand it from the perspective that factors are interacted to form a geo-environmental whole, and symbolize the whole formed by the synthesis of factors in the region.

 

Representation of Interregional Synthetic (Regional Connections) Characteristics

If regional connections need to be analysed, identify which factors are responsible for the connections between regions, list these factors, and indicate the connections using arrows.

  1. Note: The secondary indicators F2, F5, T2, S3, S4, and S5 correspond to the six dimensions of geographical synthetic thinking. The following geographic subject mind map teaching application standards (Table 3) focus on indicators reflecting the geographical synthetic thinking dimensions.