Table 1 Definition of variables.

From: Influencing factors and mechanisms on self-governed rural public open space quality: a conceptual social-ecological system (SES) framework

 

Name of Latent variables

Name of observed variables

Measurement Level

Variables’ Assignment

Expected Sign of Hypothesis

Source

Demographic profile of respondents

Age of respondent (control variable) (CV1)

Age of respondent

Interval-ratio level of measurement

   

Gender of respondent (control variable) (CV2)

Gender of respondent

Nominal level of measurement

Male = 1; Female = 2

  

Resource systems and units (RSU)

Size of public open space (RSU1)

Size of public open space

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H1: ±

Wade (1989); Biernacka and Kronenberg (2018)

Historical and cultural value (RSU2)

Historical and cultural protection public open space

Nominal level of measurement

Public open space with historical and cultural protection units = 1; Public open space without historical and cultural protection units = 2

H2: -

Zhou et al. (2019)

Location (RSU3)

Location of public open space

Nominal level of measurement

Public open space located on plain = 1; Public open space located on hilly = 2; Public open space located on mountain = 3

H3: -

Nordin et al. (2020); Huang and Tan (2023); Wang et al. (2021)

Proximity to urban area (RSU4)

Distance between urban CBD and rural public open space

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H4: ±

Oostrum (2022); Wang et al. (2009)

Governance systems (GS)

Government assistance (GS1)

Government investment projects

Nominal level of measurement

Public open space with government investment projects = 1; Public open space without government investment projects = 2

H5: -

Ying and Zhou (2007); Liu et al. (2020)

Nongovernment organizations (GS2)

Number of farmers’ professional cooperatives

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H6: +

Amelia (2007); Song et al. (2014); Wu (2012); Liang et al. (2018); Lehavi (2004)

Number of farmers’ cultural organizations

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

Public open space management regulations (GS3)

Public open space management regulations

Nominal level of measurement

Public open space with public management regulations = 1; Public open space without public management regulations = 2

H7: -

Teng (2018); Wade (1989); Baland and Platteau (1996); Ostrom (1990)

Monitoring system (GS4)

Participation of monitors

Nominal level of measurement

The village have designated monitors for public open spaces = 1; The village have not designated monitors for public open spaces = 2

H8: -

Mittelstaedt (2022); Baland and Platteau (1996); Ostrom (1990)

Actors (A)

Number of relevant actors (A1)

Number of permanent residents

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H9: ±

Lehavi (2004); Ling (2019); Ling et al. (2014); Olson (1965); Wade (1989); Baland and Platteau (1996); Shi and Ling (2023); Shi and Ling (2022); Wang et al. (2016)

Income level of villagers (A2)

Per capita income of villagers

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H10: +

Agrawal (2001)

Proportion of impoverished villagers (A3)

Proportion of impoverished villagers

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H11: -

Agrawal (2001)

Per capita homestead area (A4)

Per capita homestead area

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H12: -

Ling et al. (2019); Wade (1989); Madden (2010)

Number of village cadres (A5)

Number of village cadres

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H13: +

Zhang et al. (2012)

Education level of village leaders (A6)

Education level of party branch secretary

Nominal level of measurement

Junior high school = 1; Senior high school = 2; Junior college = 3; Bachelor = 4; Postgraduate = 5

H14: +

Zhang et al. (2024)

Education level of village committee director

Nominal level of measurement

Junior high school = 1; Senior high school = 2; Junior college = 3; Bachelor = 4; Postgraduate = 5

Age of village leaders (A7)

Age of party branch secretary

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H15: ±

Kung et al. (2009)

Age of village committee director

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

Interactions (I)

Incentive activities (I1)

Annual per capital collective bonus of villagers

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H16: +

Tang (2015); Ling et al. (2016)

Collective investment (I2)

Collective investment for public open space

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H17: ±

Ling et al. (2021); Xu and Yao (2015)

Self-organizing activities (I3)

Number of public meetings and activities

Interval-ratio level of measurement

 

H18: +

Reed et al. (2018)

Outcomes (O)

Quality of public open space (O)

Number of human-constructed facilities

Ordinal level of measurement

Low = 1; Medium = 2; High = 3

  

Maintenance of human-constructed facilities

Ordinal level of measurement

Low = 1; Medium = 2; High = 3

Hygiene

Ordinal level of measurement

Low = 1; Medium = 2; High = 3

Landscape

Ordinal level of measurement

Low = 1; Medium = 2; High = 3

Usability

Ordinal level of measurement

Low = 1; Medium = 2; High = 3

  1. In the Expected Sign of Hypothesis column, a ‘+’ indicates that the variable may have a positive impact on the quality of POS, a ‘−’ indicates a potential negative impact, and ‘±’ suggests that the variable may have either a positive or negative impact on the quality of POS.