Table 6 Weights of each factor in the comprehensive evaluation indicator system for rehabilitation landscape design effectiveness.

From: The application of grey statistical method and analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation of community park rehabilitation landscapes

Target layer A

Criterion layer D

Weight

Indicator layer P

Overall

weight ranking

Community park

rehabilitation

landscape

comprehensive

evaluation

D1 Physiological rehabilitation

0.6370

P11 Ecological diversity

0.0267

P12 Soil and Water Conservation

0.1406

P13 Climate Conditions

0.1067

P14 Duration of Sunlight

0.2359

P15 Noise Control

0.0455

P16 Pollution Reduction

0.0618

P17 Hydrological Conditions

0.0197

D2 Psychological rehabilitation

0.2583

P21 Sense of Security

0.1443

P22 Attractiveness

0.0317

P23 Human-Landscape Interaction

0.0162

P24 Boundary Scale

0.0661

D3 Psychological rehabilitation

0.1047

P31 Sense of Hierarchy

0.0167

P32 Wholeness

0.0262

P33 Symbolism

0.0105

P34 Pleasure

0.0400

P35 Aesthetic Value

0.0067

P36 Cultural Identity

0.0045