Table 3 Results of goodness-of-fit indices of Models 1 and 2.
STEM | Science | Mathematics | Technology | Engineering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | |||||
Parameter estimated | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
Chi square | \({\chi }^{2}\) (19) = 142.75, p < 0.001 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (19) = 142.75, p < 0.001 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (19) = 142.75, p < 0.001 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (19) = 142.75, p < 0.001 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (19) = 142.75, p < 0.001 |
CFI | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
TLI | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
RMSEA | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
SRMR | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Model 2 | |||||
Parameter estimated | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
Chi square | \({\chi }^{2}\) (6) = 15.03, p < 0.05 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (6) = 15.03, p < 0.05 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (6) = 15.03, p < 0.05 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (6) = 15.03, p < 0.05 | \({\chi }^{2}\) (6) = 15.03, p < 0.05 |
CFI | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
TLI | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
RMSEA | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
SRMR | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
