Table 5 Typical judicial case descriptions in the EU, the US, and China.
From: A “five rights separation” framework for data rights confirmation in data element circulation
Economic Entity | Time | Typical Case |
|---|---|---|
EU | 2004 | The British Horseracing Board (BHB) v. William Hill Organization (BHB, 2004) |
2015 | Ryanair v. PR Aviation (Ryanair, 2015) | |
2016 | Patrick Breyer v. Federal Republic of Germany, Operator of Bundeszentralregister (Patrick, 2016) | |
2021 | Norwegian Data Protection Authority v. Grindr (DPA, 2021) | |
US | 2018 | The case of Carpenter. v. American (Carpenter, 2018) |
2021 | The case of Oracle. v. Google (Oracle, 2021) | |
CN | 2019 | The case of Beijing Wei meng Chuangke Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Fuyu Culture Communication Co., Ltd. (FanYou App Weibo Data Crawling Unfair Competition Dispute, 2019) |
2019 | The case of Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Soudao Network Technology Co., Ltd. (Unfair Competition Dispute, 2019) |
