Fig. 5: An example of an anchor participant’s network maps for six of the ten quantitative thresholds. | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Fig. 5: An example of an anchor participant’s network maps for six of the ten quantitative thresholds.

From: Social network analysis to understand participant engagement in transdisciplinary team science: a large U.S. Science and Technology Center case study

Fig. 5

Anchor participants had either a strong overall Quality Proxy Threshold (QPT) and an average Integration Threshold (IT) result, or an average QPT and above-average IT result. Within the Anchor typology, the average overall QPT result for participants was 2.1, and the average overall IT score was 2.6. This specific individual in this figure had an overall QPT of 2.2 and an overall IT of 2.6. All but 1 of the 15 Anchor participants had an above-average IT result and an average QPT value.

Back to article page