Table 3 The eight participation typologies (including Non-Respondent) developed in this study, as well as the averaged Integration and Quality Proxy Threshold results and a description of a participant’s relational connections for each typology.
Quantitative scoring used to determine typologies | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Typology | Integration score | Quality proxy score | Participant definition |
Ingrained | Above | Strong | Strong interpersonal relationships across the network and deeply integrated throughout the Center. |
Anchor | Above | Average | A combination of an average and above average score from either IT or QPT category |
Average | Strong | ||
Typical | Average | Average | An average IT and QPT score. |
Connecting | Average | Weak | A combination of an average and below average combined IT and QPT score |
Below | Average | ||
Networker | Above | Weak | Highly integrated throughout the Center with weaker quality of connections |
Concentrated | Below | Strong | Less integrated throughout the Center and maintains strong quality connections |
Periphery | Below | Weak | Below-average IT and weak QPT results |
Non-Respondent | N/A | N/A | Did not take survey, but whose role in the network is recognized through the identified connections of others |
