Table 7 Results of multigroup analysis.

From: From innovativeness to insecurity: unveiling the facets of translation technology use behavior among EFL learners using TRI 2.0

Path

Rural

Urban

Path coefficient differences

p Value Henseler’s MGA

p Value Permutation Test

Decision

Path Coefficient

CI (95%)

p value

Path Coefficient

CI (95%)

p value

BI- > UB

0.324

[0.201,0.447]

0.000

0.452

[0.292,0.604]

0.000

−0.128

0.215

0.218

Reject

DIS- > BI

−0.270

[−0.400,-0.146]

0.000

−0.267

[−0.397,−0.154]

0.000

−0.004

0.962

0.974

Reject

DIS- > UB

−0.115

[−0.238,0.010]

0.071

0.009

[−0.124,0.155]

0.904

−0.123

0.194

0.211

Reject

INN- > BI

0.070

[−0.048,0.187]

0.235

0.174

[0.068,0.269]

0.001

−0.103

0.189

0.197

Reject

INN- > UB

0.087

[−0.007,0.187]

0.081

−0.007

[−0.153,0.130]

0.922

0.094

0.284

0.289

Reject

INS- > BI

−0.321

[−0.461,-0.173]

0.000

−0.317

[−0.436,-0.181]

0.000

−0.004

0.974

0.977

Reject

INS- > UB

−0.249

[−0.396,-0.106]

0.001

−0.252

[−0.422,−0.095]

0.002

0.003

0.981

0.981

Reject

OPT- > BI

0.259

[0.147,0.372]

0.000

0.236

[0.126,0.353]

0.000

0.023

0.775

0.777

Reject

OPT- > UB

0.207

[0.115,0.304]

0.000

0.167

[0.035,0.298]

0.014

0.040

0.634

0.663

Reject