Table 2 Coding scheme for moderating variables.
Variables | Category |
---|---|
Grade level | 1. Primary (ages 7–13) |
2. Secondary (ages 14–17) | |
3. College (ages over 18) | |
Type of course | 1. STEM and related courses (programming, mathematics, science, physics, etc.) |
2. Language learning and academic writing (English, academic writing courses, research methodology courses, etc.) | |
3. Skills and competencies development (teacher training courses, developing creative problem-solving skills courses, etc) | |
Learning model | 1. Personalized learning (An instructional approach that tailors learning experiences to individual student's needs, preferences, and pace, as exemplified by Song and Song (2023)) |
2. Problem-based learning (A student-centered method where learners develop knowledge and skills by solving authentic, real-world problems, as demonstrated by Urban et al. (2024)) | |
3. Project-based learning (An active learning approach in which students engage in extended projects to explore complex topics, as illustrated in Küchemann et al. (2023)) | |
4. Contextual learning (A learning approach that situates knowledge within specific, real-life contexts, as shown in Lu et al. (2024)) | |
5. Reflective learning (A process of reviewing, analyzing, and evaluating one’s learning process or outcomes, followed by necessary adjustments, as exemplified by Escalante et al. (2023)) | |
6. Mixed | |
Duration | 1. ≤1 week |
2. 1–4 weeks | |
3. 4–8 weeks | |
4. >8 weeks | |
Role of ChatGPT | 1. Intelligent tutor (primarily functions as a teacher, providing personalized guidance, feedback, and assessment to students, as exemplified by Escalante et al. (2023)) |
2. Intelligent partner (acts as a peer, engaging in dialogue and interaction with students to simulate the behavior of classmates, as shown in Li et al. (2024)) | |
3. Intelligent learning tool (focuses more on offering auxiliary functions, such as resource recommendations, knowledge retrieval, and learning progress tracking, without simulating human interaction, as exemplified by Song and Song (2023)) | |
4. Mixed | |
Area of ChatGPT application | 1. Assessment and evaluation (using ChatGPT to provide assessments and feedback on student learning, as exemplified by Escalante et al. (2023)) |
2. Tutoring (mainly refers to students using ChatGPT on their own during or after class to solve difficulties encountered in learning, as shown in Essel et al. (2024)) | |
3. Personalized recommendation (mainly refers to ChatGPT providing corresponding learning resources and suggestions based on student's individual needs, as exemplified by Song and Song (2023)) | |
4. Mixed | |
Learning Effects | 1. Higher-order thinking (primarily measured through scales and questionnaires, as shown in Lu et al. (2024)) |
2. Learning perception (primarily assessed through scales and questionnaires, as shown in Chen and Chang (2024)) | |
3. Learning performance (primarily evaluated through tests and exams, as demonstrated in Urban et al. (2024)) |