Table 9 Distributions of respondents in favor of the expansion of nuclear power plants.

From: Multi-dimensional policy decision-making model based on the quantum probability: the case of Korea’s nuclear power plant policy

  

I

S

F

E

Subtotal

Expert-level knowledge (1 person)

R1

0

2 (50%, 1st)

2 (50%, 1st)

0

4

R2

0

2 (50%, 1st)

2 (50%, 1st)

0

4

Able to understand unexplained nuclear materials (4 people)

R1

5 (29.4%, 2nd)

6 (35.3%, 1st)

1 (5.9%, 4th)

5(29.4%, 2nd)

17

R2

4 (33.3%, 1st)

4 (33.3%, 1st)

1 (8.3%, 4th)

3 (25%, 3rd)

12

I can understand the material with commentary (26 people)

R1

33 (27.5%, 2nd)

31 (25.8%, 3rd

16 (13.3%, 4th)

40 (33.3%, 1st)

120

R2

33 (28.9%, 2nd)

30 (26.3%, 3rd)

15 (13.1%, 4th)

36 (31.6%, 1st)

114

Interest at the political level (11 people)

R1

12 (23.1%, 3rd)

18 (34.6%, 1st)

7 (13.5%, 4th)

15 (28.2%, 2nd)

52

R2

11 (25.6%, 3rd)

14 (35.6%, 1st)

5 (11.6%, 4th)

13 (30.2%, 2nd)

43

Not interested at all (6 people)

R1

1 (4.5%, 4th)

9 (41.0%, 1st)

6 (27.3%, 2nd)

6 (27.3%, 2nd)

22

R2

3 (12.5%, 4th)

10 (41.7%, 1st)

5 (21.0%, 3rd)

6 (25%, 2nd)

24

Total (48 people)

R1

51 (23.7%, 3rd)

66 (30.7%, 1st)

32 (14.9%, 4th)

66 (30.7%, 1st)

215

R2

51 (25.9%, 3rd)

60 (30.5%, 1st)

28 (14.2%, 4th)

58 (29.4%, 2nd)

197