Table 5 Alternative instrument—Jinshi density effects on contemporaneous per capita wage.

From: Long-term impacts of historical education policy on wages in China: insights on over-education

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Panel A: First stage

     

Dependent variable:

Jinshi density in Ming-Qing(logged)

Distance to the Great Canal (logged)

−0.152*** (0.009)

−0.125*** (0.007)

−0.069*** (0.016)

−0.069* (0.035)

−0.082*** (0.016)

The number of Ming Courier station (logged)

0.586*** (0.022)

0.605*** (0.024)

0.495*** (0.018)

0.495*** (0.037)

0.418*** (0.121)

KP-F statistics

348.010

347.859

519.718

125.309

15.317

Panel B: Second stage

Dependent variable:

Wage per worker (logged)

Jinshi density in Ming-Qing(logged)

0.100*** (0.025)

0.085*** (0.027)

0.087** (0.035)

0.087** (0.039)

0.060*** (0.014)

Cluster

County

County

County

City

Province

Observations

250,059

250,059

250,059

250,059

241

Firm controls

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Other controls

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Provincial fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Industrial fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Each Column in each panel represents a separate cross-sectional 2SLS regression. Panel A displays first-stage results of the 2SLS estimate, showing river distance to the bamboo/pine forest effects on the regional density. In Panel B, Column (1) reports the effects of Jinshi density effects to wage per worker without any covariates. We add firm controls and other controls stepwise in Columns (2) and (3). In Column (4), we adjust the cluster to the city level. In Columns (5), we report results of city-level 2SLS estimates. Covariates include rainfall and air pollution, nightlight in 2004, population density in Ming-Qing, the urbanization rate in Ming-Qing, distance to coast, agricultural sustainability, and terrain ruggedness. All 2SLS regressions are clustered at the county level. These estimated Jinshi density effects can be interpreted as the percentage changes in wages per worker with a percent change in Jinshi density. The KP F-statistic is the Kleibergen-Paap Wald rk F-statistic for weak identification in the first stage (Kleibergen and Paap, 2006). *** denotes significant at 1% level, ** denotes significant at 5% level, * denotes significant at 10% level.