Table 1 Descriptive statistics for the main variables.

From: Does marketization promote economic growth?—Empirical evidence from 26 transition countries

Variables

Observations

Mean

SD

Min

Max

overallscore

1122

64.40

10.31

30

83.1

lngdppercap

1166

9.20

1.43

5.33

11.38

lnpop

1166

16.31

1.55

12.50

21.06

lnpopdens

1154

4.17

1.21

0.86

6.24

youthdep

1166

0.31

0.11

0.19

0.86

olddep

1166

0.19

0.06

0.05

0.39

lawdum

1166

2.47

0.86

1

4

lat

1166

46.15

8.41

19.43

64.13

t

1166

9.50

5.19

1

18

misallocation

1166

95.04

2.53

82.92

99.65

scorepre

1154

65.62

7.85

36.82

80.61

gap_abs

1112

5.22

4.16

0.01

18.63

open

1160

89.13

43.86

16.75

333.53

fdi

1144

4.77

7.02

−55.07

76.33

urbanratio

1166

0.68

0.16

0.26

1

agedepen

1166

50.07

7.32

36.04

92.92

inflation

1165

13.07

52.75

−18.93

987.07

saving

1160

21.15

11.94

−34.61

61.14

popdens

1154

110.89

109.41

2.35

513.66

govconsum

1160

18.06

4.70

5.69

29.79

  1. OECD countries have accumulated more experience in the process of market-oriented reforms, and it has been confirmed by research that the increase in economic freedom has played a significant role in promoting economic growth in these countries. This paper estimates the factors influencing the optimal level of marketization by controlling for some national characteristics of the OECD countries, and it only seeks to demonstrate that the optimal level of marketization is constrained by informal institutional factors, so that such an operation does not bias the findings of the study.