Table 9 Results of robustness test.

From: Differential analysis of the impact of adopting outsourced machinery services on land transfer between contracted and outsourced land-holding

Variables

Contracted land-holding (Landout)

Outsourced land-holding (Landout)

Outsourced land-holding (Landin)

OMSc

−1.126*** (−5.95)

  

OMSo

 

−0.404* (−1.71)

66.418*** (8.05)

Gender

−0.390 (−1.22)

−0.382 (−1.12)

6.401** (2.50)

Age

0.018 (1.49)

0.019 (1.43)

−0.290* (−1.96)

Education

0.011 (0.35)

0.018 (0.57)

−0.186 (−0.80)

Health

−0.115 (−1.54)

−0.109 (−1.46)

2.77** (2.50)

Income

−6.26e–07 (−0.53)

−2.63e–06*** (−2.71)

0.0003* (1.76)

Cadre

0.488** (2.02)

0.425* (1.73)

2.576 (0.63)

CCPM

0.440 (1.18)

0.562 (1.49)

−2.824 (−1.18)

Population

−0.008 (−0.14)

−0.057 (−1.07)

0.224 (0.29)

Labor force

0.053 (0.71)

0.047 (0.60)

−0.313 (−0.16)

Deposit

−3.20e–07 (−0.46)

4.44e–07 (0.53)

7.61e–06 (0.33)

Borrow

−2.93e–07 (−0.89)

1.16e–07 (0.51)

0.0002*** (2.74)

Terrain

0.131 (0.49)

0.191 (0.64)

1.083 (0.22)

Road

0.350*** (3.72)

0.520***(5.44)

5.275 (1.60)

Village

0.00008 (1.57)

0.0001**(2.20)

0.003 (1.34)

Constant term

1.623 (1.54)

1.015 (0.93)

−11.580 (−0.89)

F-value/Wald chi2

7.81***

4.96***

129.70***

Hausman test

74.30***

58.18***

30.49**

N

5873

5721

5721

  1. *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels of statistical significance, respectively. Values in () represent T-values of the parameters.