Table 5 Regression relationship between natural and economic variables and the composite index of rural household wealth at the county level.
Wealth index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
Elevation | −0.189*** | −0.182*** | −0.160*** | −0.158*** | −0.168*** |
(0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | (0.007) | (0.009) | |
Temperature | 1.014*** | 1.000*** | 1.027*** | 1.016*** | 0.291*** |
(0.023) | (0.023) | (0.023) | (0.023) | (0.035) | |
River Density | 0.043*** | 0.041*** | 0.043*** | 0.020* | |
(0.015) | (0.015) | (0.014) | (0.012) | ||
Urbanization Rate | 0.813*** | 0.599*** | 0.343*** | ||
(0.077) | (0.095) | (0.078) | |||
Per Capita GDP | 0.098*** | 0.048** | |||
(0.026) | (0.021) | ||||
Constant Term | −4.656*** | −4.777*** | −5.441*** | −5.443*** | −0.581** |
(0.139) | (0.145) | (0.154) | (0.153) | (0.226) | |
Number of Samples | 1830 | 1830 | 1830 | 1830 | 1830 |
R2 | 0.654 | 0.655 | 0.675 | 0.678 | 0.799 |
Standard error | 0.444 (df = 1827) | 0.443 (df = 1826) | 0.430 (df = 1825) | 0.429 (df = 1824) | 0.340 (df = 1816) |