Table 12 Results of the test of the mediating effect of GTFP on the pilot ETS–GPT synergy.
Variable name | (1) | (2) | (3) | (7) | (8) | (6) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lnCEa | GTFP | lnCEa | lnCIa | lnCIa | lnREG | lnREG | lnPREG | lnPREG | |
GTFP | −0.3322*** (0.1127) | −0.3332*** (0.1130) | 0.5150** (0.2191) | −0.0338 (0.0981) | |||||
\(DI{D}_{pilotETS}\times pos{t}_{{\rm{GPT}}}\) | −0.5654*** (0.0591) | −0.0280 (0.0271) | −0.5747*** (0.0586) | −0.5663*** (0.0593) | −0.5756*** (0.0588) | −0.0347 (0.1145) | −0.0203 (0.1140) | −0.1042** (0.0509) | −0.1052** (0.0510) |
Control variable | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Province fixed effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Year fixed effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Constant | 6.9104 (4.3399) | −2.2766 (1.9893) | 6.1540 (4.3028) | 16.3262*** (4.3153) | 15.5676*** (2.6337) | −44.1114*** (8.4029) | −42.9389*** (8.3665) | 7.8334** (3.7353) | 7.7564** (3.7465) |
Sobel test | 0.0093 (0.0095) | 0.0205 (0.0180) | −0.0144 (0.0153) | 0.0009 (0.0029) | |||||
Size of mediation effect | 0.0093 | 0.0106 | −0.0145 | −0.0091 | |||||
Share of intermediation effect | −0.0165 | −0.0353 | 0.4157 | 0.0010 | |||||
Sample size | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 | 420 |
R2 | 0.9550 | 0.8347 | 0.9560 | 0.9612 | 0.9621 | 0.9348 | 0.9393 | 0.8601 | 0.8601 |