Table 4 Engagement of interdisciplinary teams and stakeholders in data ethics frameworks of countries and supranational alliances.
Rank | C/SA | Engagement of interdisciplinary teams and stakeholders |
|---|---|---|
1 | United Kingdom | UK’s framework identifies “engaging a diverse range of experts” as one of its specific actions. |
2 | United States | American framework has established an interdepartmental team for the development of the framework, consisting of 14 leaders from various government departments. |
3 | Germany | The members of the German Federal Government Data Ethics Commission encompass professionals from multiple sectors, including law, industry, education, media, consumer protection, and information technology. |
4 | Australia | Australia’s framework received over 130 written submissions during its consultation phase. Stakeholder roundtables and targeted consultations were held in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Canberra. |
5 | Switzerland | The Swiss Personalized Health Network has established an Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications advisory group to develop the framework. |
6 | Singapore | Singapore promotes stakeholder engagement in AI development and decision-making, providing feedback channels for opinions and requests for organizational reviews. |
7 | European Union | EU’s framework received feedback from over 500 contributors during the public consultation phase. It also sees diverse, inclusive design teams, stakeholder engagement, and societal dialog as integral components to trustworthy AI. |
8 | UNESCO | UNESCO acknowledges that the ethical issues associated with AI are highly intricate, requiring a multi-stakeholder and interdisciplinary dialogue to build consensus. |
9 | OECD | OECD encourages multidisciplinary and multi-stakeholder engagement in the responsible governance of trustworthy AI. |
