Table 2 Description of the included studies according to type of design, key actor (Tourist, Resident, Worker, Government) and methodological quality.

From: Effects of tourism on well-being from the perspective of key actors: a scoping review

Study designs

Key actor

Quality criterion MMAT, GRADE-CERQual

 

Approach

#

T

R

W

G

Methodological quality criteria

Yes

No

Can’t tell

Qualitative (10)

Case study

1

7

2

0

1

Appropriate Approach

10

  

Ethnography

2

Adequate Methods

10

  

Grounded theory

3

Data-Derived Findings

10

  

Narrative analysis

3

Substantiated Interpretation

10

  

Thematic analysis

1

Data Coherence

10

  

Non-randomized (23)

Cohort study

6

10

6

0

7

Representative Participants

18

4

 

Other (Cross-lagged panel analysis, coordination analysis, spatial analysis)

3

Appropriate Measurements

23

  

Cross-sectional analytic study

5

Complete Outcome Data

22

1

 

Before and after study time series

6

Confounders Accounted

13

10

 

Confirmatory Quantitative Design

3

Intended Intervention

9

 

14

Quantitative descriptive (36)

Survey (SEM, PLS-SEM)

35

27

6

3

0

Relevant Sampling

34

2

 

Factor analysis

1

Representative Sample

26

10

 
  

Appropriate Measurements

36

  

Low Nonresponse Bias

27

5

4

Appropriate Analysis

36

  

Mixed methods (6)

Convergent design

3

3

2

1

0

Mixed Methods Rationale

6

  

Sequential explanatory

1

Effective Integration

6

  

Sequential exploratory

2

Interpreted Outputs

6

  
  

Addressed Divergences

6

  

Adherence to Quality

6

  

Theoretical articles (12)

 

12

3

3

0

6

Theoretical Connection

12

  

Consistent Argumentation

12

  

Novel Concepts

11

1

 

Conceptual Clarity

12

  

Potential Impact

11

1

 

Literature reviews (2)

 

2

1

0

0

1

Clear Purpose

2

  

Explicit Criteria

2

  

Coherent Synthesis

2

  

Consistent Conclusions

2

  

Identified Gaps

2