Table 2 Description of the included studies according to type of design, key actor (Tourist, Resident, Worker, Government) and methodological quality.
From: Effects of tourism on well-being from the perspective of key actors: a scoping review
Study designs | Key actor | Quality criterion MMAT, GRADE-CERQual | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approach | # | T | R | W | G | Methodological quality criteria | Yes | No | Can’t tell | |
Qualitative (10) | Case study | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Appropriate Approach | 10 | ||
Ethnography | 2 | Adequate Methods | 10 | |||||||
Grounded theory | 3 | Data-Derived Findings | 10 | |||||||
Narrative analysis | 3 | Substantiated Interpretation | 10 | |||||||
Thematic analysis | 1 | Data Coherence | 10 | |||||||
Non-randomized (23) | Cohort study | 6 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 7 | Representative Participants | 18 | 4 | |
Other (Cross-lagged panel analysis, coordination analysis, spatial analysis) | 3 | Appropriate Measurements | 23 | |||||||
Cross-sectional analytic study | 5 | Complete Outcome Data | 22 | 1 | ||||||
Before and after study time series | 6 | Confounders Accounted | 13 | 10 | ||||||
Confirmatory Quantitative Design | 3 | Intended Intervention | 9 | 14 | ||||||
Quantitative descriptive (36) | Survey (SEM, PLS-SEM) | 35 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 0 | Relevant Sampling | 34 | 2 | |
Factor analysis | 1 | Representative Sample | 26 | 10 | ||||||
Appropriate Measurements | 36 | |||||||||
Low Nonresponse Bias | 27 | 5 | 4 | |||||||
Appropriate Analysis | 36 | |||||||||
Mixed methods (6) | Convergent design | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Mixed Methods Rationale | 6 | ||
Sequential explanatory | 1 | Effective Integration | 6 | |||||||
Sequential exploratory | 2 | Interpreted Outputs | 6 | |||||||
Addressed Divergences | 6 | |||||||||
Adherence to Quality | 6 | |||||||||
Theoretical articles (12) | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | Theoretical Connection | 12 | |||
Consistent Argumentation | 12 | |||||||||
Novel Concepts | 11 | 1 | ||||||||
Conceptual Clarity | 12 | |||||||||
Potential Impact | 11 | 1 | ||||||||
Literature reviews (2) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Clear Purpose | 2 | |||
Explicit Criteria | 2 | |||||||||
Coherent Synthesis | 2 | |||||||||
Consistent Conclusions | 2 | |||||||||
Identified Gaps | 2 |