Table 7 Descriptive statistics of three tourist segments and Dunn’s pairwise tests.

From: Segmenting Chinese rural tourist preferences: insights from a choice experiment

Socio-demographic characteristics

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Dunn’s tests

Senior Nature Seekers

Young Quality Explorers

Broad-acceptance Experience Pursuers

Class 1 vs Class 2

Class 1 vs Class 3

Class 2 vs Class 3

(12.43%)

(35.03%)

(52.54%)

Gender (%)

Male

38.64

39.52

45.16

   

Female

61.36

60.48

54.84

   

Age (%)

Low

11.36

91.94

53.23

***

***

***

High

88.64

8.06

46.77

   

Education (%)

Low

72.73

18.55

37.63

***

***

***

High

27.27

81.45

62.37

   

Income (%)

Low

65.91

60.48

55.38

   

High

34.09

39.52

44.62

   

Children (%)

No

11.36

44.35

13.98

***

 

***

Yes

88.64

55.65

86.02

   

Environmental Awareness (%)

Low

36.36

67.74

38.71

***

 

***

High

63.64

32.26

61.29

   

Rural Tourism Cognition (%)

Low

31.82

41.94

38.17

   

High

68.18

58.06

61.83

   

Government Promotion (%)

Low

79.55

57.26

53.23

**

***

 

High

20.45

42.74

46.77

   
  1. Percentages are within-segment proportions.
  2. “Low/High” were coded as follows: Age (High = 1 if above the sample mean), Education (High = 1 if undergraduate or above), Income (High = 1 if above the sample mean), Children (Yes = 1), Environmental Awareness / Rural Tourism Cognition / Government Promotion (High = 1 if above the scale mean).
  3. The three rightmost columns report significance from Dunn’s two-sided post-hoc pairwise tests following a Kruskal–Wallis omnibus test (no multiple-comparison adjustment).
  4. **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.