Abstract
The humanities have distinct publication practices compared to the sciences, with books and local language literature being essential. This study aims to identify and analyze the publication patterns of humanities scholars in Spanish-speaking countries, revealing unique publication behaviors and fostering diverse perspectives rather than linear knowledge progression. We analyzed the publication histories of approximately 40,000 scholars from 1950 to 2021 using data from the Dialnet database. By identifying archetypal publication profiles, we explored their distribution across generational cohorts and research topics. Our findings reveal substantial generational shifts toward journal-centric publication patterns, probably influenced by bibliometric-driven evaluation systems. They also show a relation between publication patterns and research topics. This highlights the need for more inclusive assessment practices that recognize the diverse nature of humanities scholarship. We contribute to ongoing discussions on promoting bibliodiversity in research assessment and the potential impacts of current policies on the humanities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data underlying this study and supplementary materials are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13905465. Code scripts are available at the GitHub repository https://github.com/Wences91/humanities_patterns.
References
Archambault É, Vignola-Gagné É, Côté G et al (2006) Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: the limits of existing databases. Scientometrics 68(3):329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z
Arroyo-Machado W, Robinson-Garcia N (2023) Towards a science of humanities: how big data can solve the limitations of scientometrics. In: Gallego Cuiñas, A, Torres-Salinas, D (eds) Humanities and big data in Ibero-America. De Gruyter, pp 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110753523-006
Becher T, Trowler PR (2001) Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines
Buela-Casal G (2007) Reflections on the accreditation system of tenured university professors in Spain. Psicothema 19(3):473–482
Cañibano C, Vilardell I, Corona C et al (2018) The evaluation of research excellence and the dynamics of knowledge production in the humanities: the case of history in Spain. Sci Public Policy 45(6):775–789. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy025
Chavarro D, Tang P, Rafols I (2014) Interdisciplinarity and research on local issues: evidence from a developing country. Res Eval 23(3):195–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu012
CoARA (2022) The agreement. Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment
Cutler A, Breiman L (1994) Archetypal analysis. Technometrics 36(4):338–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1994.10485840
Davison ML, Sireci SG (2000) Multidimensional scaling. In: Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Elsevier, pp 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50013-6
Engels TCE, Istenič Starčič A, Kulczycki E et al (2018) Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?. Aslib J Inf Manag 70(6):592–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0127
Eugster MJA, Leisch F (2009) From spider-man to hero—archetypal analysis in r. J Stat Softw 30(8). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v030.i08
Eugster MJA, Leisch F (2011) Weighted and robust archetypal analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(3):1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.10.017
Frandsen TF, Nicolaisen J (2008) Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59(10):1570–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20817
Giménez-Toledo E, Mañana-Rodríguez J, Sivertsen G (2017) Scholarly book publishing: its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanities. Res Eval 26(2):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx007
Glänzel W, Thijs B, Chi P-S (2016) The challenges to expand bibliometric studies from periodical literature to monographic literature with a new data source: the book citation index. Scientometrics 109(3):2165–2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2046-7
Hammarfelt B (2014) Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics 101(2):1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3
Hammarfelt B (2016) Beyond coverage: toward a bibliometrics for the humanities. In: Ochsner, M, Hug, SE, Daniel, H-D (eds) Research assessment in the humanities: towards criteria and procedures. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_10
Hammarfelt B (2017) Recognition and reward in the academy: valuing publication oeuvres in biomedicine, economics and history. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):607–623. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0006
Hammarfelt B, de Rijcke S (2015) Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of arts at Uppsala University. Res Eval 24(1):63–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu029
Hicks D (1999) The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics 44(2):193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380
Hicks D (2005) The four literatures of social science. In: Moed, HF, Glänzel, W, Schmoch, U (eds) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: the use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_22
Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L et al (2015) Bibliometrics: the Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548):429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Hug SE, Ochsner M, Daniel H-D (2013) Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history. Res Eval 22(5):369–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt008
Jiménez-Contreras E, De Moya Anegón F, López-Cózar ED (2003) The evolution of research activity in Spain. Res Policy 32(1):123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00008-2
Knöchelmann M (2024) Formal authorship in the wake of uncertain futures: the narrative of publish or perish in the humanities. Res Eval 33: rvae044. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae044
Kolde R (2025) Pheatmap: pretty heatmaps (version 1.0.13)
Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. Vol. 962. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kulczycki E, Engels TCE, Pölönen J et al (2018) Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics 116(1):463–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0
Kulczycki E, Guns R, Pölönen J et al (2020) Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a seven-country European study. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 71(11):1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24336
Kulczycki E, Korytkowski P (2020) Researchers publishing monographs are more productive and more local-oriented. Scientometrics 125(2):1371–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03376-x
Leeuwen T Van (2013) Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the social sciences and humanities: a problematic relationship? Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung, 2. https://doi.org/10.5283/bpf.173
Linmans A (2009) Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link: indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics 83(2):337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9
López Piñeiro C, Hicks D (2015) Reception of Spanish sociology by domestic and foreign audiences differs and has consequences for evaluation. Res Eval 24(1):78–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu030
Mateo F (2015) Producción científica en español en humanidades y ciencias sociales. Algunas propuestas desde Dialnet. El profesional de la información. 24(5)
Nederhof AJ (2006) Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics 66(1):81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
Ochsner M, Hug SE, Daniel H-D (2013) Four types of research in the humanities: setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities. Res Eval 22(2):79–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs039
OpenAI (2022) API platform. OpenAI
Ossenblok TLB, Engels TCE, Sivertsen G (2012) The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the web of science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9). Res Eval 21(4):280–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs019
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria
Ràfols I, Ciarli T, Chavarro D (2019) Under-reporting research relevant to local needs in the south: database biases in rice research. In: Arvanitis, R, O’Brien, D (eds) The transformation of research in the south: policies and outcomes. Hors collection, IRD Éditions, Marseille, pp 105–110. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.33212
Reale E, Avramov D, Canhial K et al (2018) A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. Res Eval 27(4):298–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025
Robinson-Garcia N, Costas R, Nane GF et al (2023) Valuation regimes in academia: researchers’ attitudes towards their diversity of activities and academic performance. Res Eval 32(2):496–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac049
Rose S, Engel D, Cramer N et al (2010) Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: Berry, MW, Kogan, J (eds) Text mining, 1st ed. Wiley, pp 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470689646.ch1
Sivertsen G (2016) Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics 107(2):357–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1845-1
Sivertsen G, Larsen B (2012) Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics 91(2):567–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3
Sokal A (1996) A physicist experiments with cultural studies. Ling Franca 6(4):62–64
Toledo EG (2020) Why books are important in the scholarly communication system in social sciences and humanities. Scholarly assessment reports. 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.14
Torres-Salinas D, Moed HF (2009) Library catalog analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: an exploratory study of published book titles in economics. J Informetr 3(1):9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.10.002
Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2019) From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep 9(1):5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z
Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Verleysen FT, Weeren A (2016) Clustering by publication patterns of senior authors in the social sciences and humanities. J Informetr 10(1):254–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.004
Wang J (2013) Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics 94(3):851–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9
Zuccala A, Robinson-García N (2019) Reviewing, indicating, and counting books for modern research evaluation systems. In: Glänzel, W, Moed, HF, Schmoch, U, Thelwall, M (eds) Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_27
Acknowledgments
This work is part of the COMPARE project (REF: PID2020-117007RA-I00) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science (Ref: MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 FSE invierte en tu futuro). Nicolas Robinson-Garcia is funded by a Ramón y Cajal grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (REF: RYC2019-027886-I). Elvira González-Salmón is funded by a FPU grant from the Spanish Ministry of Universities (FPU2021/02320). We would like to thank the Dialnet Foundation for providing access to the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NRG: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. WAM: Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Resources; Visualization; Writing—review & editing-. EGS: Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. DTS: Supervision; Validation; Writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required as this study did not involve human participants or animal subjects.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson-Garcia, N., Arroyo-Machado, W., González-Salmón, E. et al. Publication patterns in the humanities: an author-level analysis of generational shifts and changing research agendas. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06604-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06604-6
