Table 1 Remote patient monitoring systematic review study

From: Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

First author, year

Study duration

Sample size

Percent male (%)

Mean age

High quality study?a

Scalvini, 2005

7 days

310

24

52.5

No

Dansky, 2008

4 months

284

N/A

77

No

Woodend, 2008

15 months

249

75.1

63.6

No

Tan, 2010

2 weeks

120

40.6

48

No

Shuger, 2011

9 months

197

18.3

46.9

Yes

Chau, 2012

2 months

40

97.5

72.9

Yes

Dinesen, 2012

4 months

105

N/A

68

Yes

Fox, 2012

3 months

75

80

53.5

No

Logan, 2012

12 months

105

55.7

49

Yes

Ryan, 2012

6 months

288

37.4

49

No

De San Miguel, 2013

6 months

80

48.5

72.5

Yes

Greene, 2013

6 months

349

21.1

N/A

No

Lee, 2013

3 months

55

80.2

56.1

No

Pedone, 2013

9 months

99

67.5

74.7

Yes

Wijsman, 2013

3 months

226

59.2

64.8

Yes

Luley, 2014

12 months

178

58.7

50.3

No

Piga, 2014

3 months

40

2.5

56.9

Yes

Dorsch, 2015

15 months

135

59.3

62.3

Yes

Kent, 2015

14.5 months

112

40.8

43.3

Yes

Kim, 2015

29 months

374

58

57.1

Yes

Pedone, 2015

6 months

90

38.9

79.8

No

Wang, 2015

1.5 months

67

8.9

48.2

Yes

Bloss, 2016

6 months

130

44

55.5

No

Ginis, 2016

2.5 months

38

N/A

N/A

Yes

Ong, 2016

3 months

1437

53.1

73.5

Yes

Finkelstein, 2016

12 months

800

46.3

35.5

Yes

Jakicic, 2016

24 months

470

22.8

N/A

Yes

  1. a A high-quality study is a study with a Jadad score ≥ 3 (5-point scale) (15)