Table 1 Inclusion criteria adopted to enable the identification of suitable feasibility studies

From: A systematic review of feasibility studies promoting the use of mobile technologies in clinical research

Pre-review

Reported results of original data collection (for example, meta-analyses, editorials, letters, opinion pieces, and methods papers were excluded).

Population

Collected data from human participants (for example, studies that reported results of a computer simulation were excluded).

Stated a specific therapeutic area.

 

Defined a participant population that either:

 

a. Included participants from the target population or;

b. Included participants that would be generalizable to the target population.

Intervention

Included at least one mobile technology meeting our definition for objective outcome (efficacy or safety) data capture.

 

Defined the specific technology used.

Comparator

Specified a comparator (sensor performance and algorithm development studies only).

Outcome

Evaluated mobile technology/ies capturing objective outcomes data (for example, studies examining as the primary technology were excluded).

 

When mobile technology/ies were used as a therapeutic intervention, the study reported outcomes data.

Study design

Described a feasibility study in line with our definition; specifically, a feasibility study addresses one or more of the following components:

a. Performance of an outcome of interest against a comparator where the outcome of interest could be related to:

 i. Measurement performance of sensor and/or;

 ii. Algorithm performance (clinical endpoints);

b. Human factors considerations (acceptability, tolerability and usability);

c. Participant adherence;

d. Completeness of data.

 

Captured data outside of a clinical setting or captured data in an inpatient or clinic setting specifically to enable out-of-clinic use.

 

Reported data from a participant sample (for example, case studies were excluded; however, n-of-1 studies12 were considered in scope).

 

Country of origin is reported to have “high’’ or “very high’’ human development by the United Nations Human Development Index, http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/HDI.

  1. ePRO electronic patient-reported outcome