Table 3 Comparative analysis of biomarker sources towards assessing human performance
From: Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete
Source | Location | Advantages | Drawbacks | SOC | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apocrine Sweat | Underarm, groin | Sweat volume, noninvasive and continuous measurements possible | Locations on body may intrude athlete mobility/comfort, limited locations on body. | No. There remains a need to validate fabricated devices in formalized studies | |
Blood | In the body | Well validated technology | Cannot be measured continuously, real-time, or noninvasively. | Yes. Sample drawn during physicals or when necessary. | |
Eccrine Sweat | Pores distributed across skin (>100 glands/cm2) | Noninvasive, continuous measurements possible without intruding on athlete mobility | Skin contamination, dried sweat on the glands, low-sampling rates, sample volume (e.g., function of weather conditions). | Yes. There remains a need to continue to validate wearable devices in formalized studies | |
Urine | Bladder | Sample volume, ease of access | Noninvasive, continuous measurements are not possible | Yes, urine color used to assess hydration. Biomarkers from urine used during drug tests | |
Saliva | Mouth | Sample volume, ease of access | Limited to sports which require or necessitate mouthguard devices. Point-of-care (POC) devices currently developed in literature do not permit continuous measurements. | No. There remains a need to validate fabricated devices in formalized studies | |
Tears | Eyes | Noninvasive measurement possible | Sample volume, continuous measurements not possible over long duration, limited biomarkers can be detected, athlete comfort and safety | No. There remains a need to validate fabricated devices in formalized studies. |