Table 3 Comparative analysis of biomarker sources towards assessing human performance

From: Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete

Source

Location

Advantages

Drawbacks

SOC

References

Apocrine Sweat

Underarm, groin

Sweat volume, noninvasive and continuous measurements possible

Locations on body may intrude athlete mobility/comfort, limited locations on body.

No. There remains a need to validate fabricated devices in formalized studies

19

Blood

In the body

Well validated technology

Cannot be measured continuously, real-time, or noninvasively.

Yes. Sample drawn during physicals or when necessary.

135

Eccrine Sweat

Pores distributed across skin (>100 glands/cm2)

Noninvasive, continuous measurements possible without intruding on athlete mobility

Skin contamination, dried sweat on the glands, low-sampling rates, sample volume (e.g., function of weather conditions).

Yes. There remains a need to continue to validate wearable devices in formalized studies

18,19,– 20

Urine

Bladder

Sample volume, ease of access

Noninvasive, continuous measurements are not possible

Yes, urine color used to assess hydration. Biomarkers from urine used during drug tests

107, 136, 137

Saliva

Mouth

Sample volume, ease of access

Limited to sports which require or necessitate mouthguard devices. Point-of-care (POC) devices currently developed in literature do not permit continuous measurements.

No. There remains a need to validate fabricated devices in formalized studies

12, 14, 15, 107, 108

Tears

Eyes

Noninvasive measurement possible

Sample volume, continuous measurements not possible over long duration, limited biomarkers can be detected, athlete comfort and safety

No. There remains a need to validate fabricated devices in formalized studies.

138, 139

  1. SOC standard of care (as defined by their use in sports today)