Table 2 Risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale.

From: Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews

Study

Selection

Comparability

Exposure

 

Case−control

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Total

Abdullah et al.49

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/9

Al Imran et al.50

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/9

Ashouri et al.20

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

5/9

Bishop et al.23

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

4/9

Bounds et al.53

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

4/9

Caza-Szoka et al.54

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

3/9

Caza-Szoka et al.24

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

3/9

Chan et al.55

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

6/9

Darvishi et al.25

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

4/9

Du et al.57

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

6/9

Hu et al.28

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

4/9

Hung et al.29

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1/9

Jin-Heeku et al.32

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/9

LeDuff et al.34

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

2/9

Melo Riveros et al.40

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

3/9

Oliver et al.41

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

4/9

Oliver et al.42

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

4/9

Olugbade et al.62

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/9

Parsaeian et al44.

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

4/9

Sandag et al.63

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/9

Silva et al.47

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

2/9

Ung et al.64

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

6/9

Karabulut et al.58

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/9

Mathew et al.38

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

3/9

Mathew et al.61

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

5/9

Vaughn et al.65

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

5/9

Vaughn et al.66

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

5/9

Vaughn et al.48

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

5/9

Sari et al.45

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

2/9

Cohort

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total

Magnusson et al.37

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0

1

6/9

Azimi et al.21

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

6/9

Azimi et al.22

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

5/9

Barons et al.52

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

6/9

Hallner et al.27

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

6/9

Jarvik et al.30

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

7/9

Jiang et al.31

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

5/9

Shamim et al.46

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

5/9

Othera

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total

Kadhim et al.33

Lee et al.19

Lin et al.60

Andrei et al.51

Li et al.59

Dickey et al.56

Liszka-Hackzell et al.35

Liszka-Hackzell et al.36

Meier et al.39

Gal et al.26

Oude et al.43

  1. Higher scores indicate better quality.
  2. aNeither case−control nor cohort study design.