Table 3 Regression model testing the predictive role of clinical variables, demographics, brain status, 6MWD at T0, and CRIq subscores on 6MWT at T1 in responders

From: Exploring cognitive reserve’s influence: unveiling the dynamics of digital telerehabilitation in Parkinson’s Disease Resilience

Model

Unstandardized

SE

Standardized

t

p

1

(Intercept)

27.07

96.71

 

0.28

0.783

6MWD at T0

0.83

0.14

0.73

6.03

<0.001

H&Y

−34.16

16.37

−0.21

−2.09

0.053

Age

0.99

0.89

0.12

1.11

0.285

CRI Education

0.17

0.66

0.03

0.26

0.797

CRI Working Activity

0.38

0.36

0.14

1.05

0.311

CRI Leisure Time

0.44

0.32

0.15

1.37

0.188

2

(Intercept)

34.77

89.56

 

0.39

0.703

6MWD at T0

0.83

0.13

0.73

6.21

<0.001

H&Y

−34.42

15.89

−0.21

−2.17

0.045

age

1.05

0.84

0.13

1.24

0.232

CRI Working Activity

0.44

0.29

0.16

1.52

0.147

CRI Leisure Time

0.47

0.29

0.16

1.60

0.128

3

(Intercept)

118.49

59.70

 

1.99

0.063

6MWD at T0

0.78

0.13

0.68

6.05

<0.001

H&Y

−29.07

15.52

−0.18

−1.87

0.077

CRI Working Activity

0.37

0.29

0.13

1.29

0.213

CRI Leisure Time

0.50

0.29

0.17

1.71

0.105

4

(Intercept)

137.22

58.92

 

2.33

0.031

6MWD at T0

0.83

0.12

0.73

6.84

<0.001

H&Y

−33.57

15.39

−0.21

−2.18

0.042

CRI Leisure Time

0.57

0.29

0.19

1.94

0.067

  1. SE standard error, 6MWD 6 min Walk Distance test, CRI Cognitive Reserve Index, H&Y Hoehn and Yahr Scale. Statistically significant comparisons are reported in bold.
Back to article page