Table 3 Likert Questionnaire

From: Accuracy and efficiency of drilling trajectories with augmented reality versus conventional navigation randomized crossover trial

#

Likert questions

AR method (n = 36)

Conventional method (n = 36)

Difference

p

1.

The (AR-based | conventional) navigation system interfered with my drilling trajectory.

1.5 (0.7)

1.8 (0.9)

−0.3

0.189

2.

With the (AR-based conventional) navigation system, it is easy to find the starting point.

3.4 (0.7)

2.8 (1.0)

0.6

0.007

3.

With the (AR-based conventional) navigation system, it is easy to set the orientation.

3.4 (0.8)

2.9 (0.8)

0.5

0.012

4.

The (AR-based | conventional) navigation system is easy to use.

3.4 (0.8)

2.9 (1.0)

0.5

0.017

5.

I felt safe using the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system.

3.2 (0.7)

2.8 (0.9)

0.4

0.073

6.

The (AR-based | conventional) navigation system is good for drilling trajectories.

3.5 (0.7)

2.9 (0.7)

0.6

0.001

7.

I find the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system unnecessarily complex.

1.6 (0.8)

1.9 (0.9)

−0.3

0.180

8.

I think I would need the assistance of a technical person to use the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system.

2.1 (0.9)

2.1 (1.0)

0.0

0.958

9.

I think that the various functions in the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system were well integrated.

3.4 (0.8)

2.8 (0.8)

0.6

0.001

10.

I still have a lot to learn before I could use the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system.

2.0 (0.8)

2.4 (1.0)

−0.4

0.124

11.

I found the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system intuitive.

3.4 (0.7)

2.8 (0.9)

0.6

<0.001

12.

I drilled the trajectories accurately with the (AR-based | conventional) navigation system.

2.9 (0.7)

2.5 (0.8)

0.4

0.035