Table 2 Accuracy of LLM-only and LLM-assisted risk-of-bias assessments
From: Language models for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in complementary medicine
Domains of ROB assessment | LLM-only risk-of-bias assessments | LLM-assisted risk-of-bias assessments | Rate difference between LLM-assisted and LLM-only ROB assessments (95% CI) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of correct assessments | No. of total assessments | Correct assessment rate (95% CI) | Mean No. of correct assessments per reviewer | Mean No. of total assessments per reviewer | Correct assessment rate (95% CI) | ||
Sequence generation | 94 | 107 | 87.85% (80.12% to 93.37%) | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 8.41% (1.25% to 15.57%) |
Allocation sequence concealment | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 105 | 107 | 98.13% (93.41% to 99.77%) | 1.87% (-2.55% to 6.29%) |
Blinding: patients | 102 | 107 | 95.33% (89.43% to 98.47%) | 104 | 107 | 97.20% (92.02% to 99.42%) | 1.87% (-3.21% to 6.95%) |
Blinding: healthcare providers | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 105 | 107 | 98.13% (93.41% to 99.77%) | 1.87% (-2.55% to 6.29%) |
Blinding: data collectors | 101 | 107 | 94.39% (88.19% to 97.91%) | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 1.87% (-3.78% to 7.52%) |
Blinding: outcome assessors | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 0.00% (-5.08% to 5.08%) |
Blinding: data analysts | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 104 | 107 | 97.20% (92.02% to 99.42%) | 0.93% (-3.83% to 5.70%) |
Missing outcome data | 107 | 107 | 100.00% (96.61% to 100.00%) | 106 | 107 | 99.07% (94.90% to 99.98%) | -0.93% (-3.49% to 1.62%) |
Selective outcome reporting | 106 | 107 | 99.07% (94.90% to 99.98%) | 106 | 107 | 99.07% (94.90% to 99.98%) | 0.00% (-2.58% to 2.58%) |
Other bias | 102 | 107 | 95.33% (89.43% to 98.47%) | 103 | 107 | 96.26% (90.70% to 98.97%) | 0.93% (-4.44% to 6.31%) |
Overall | 1024 | 1070 | 95.70% (94.31% to 96.84%) | 1041 | 1070 | 97.29% (96.13% to 98.18%) | 1.59% (0.03% to 3.15%) |