Table 4 Detected outcomes by the primary modes in different groups of operators

From: Effect of computer aided detection system on esophageal neoplasm diagnosis in varied levels of endoscopists

Variable

Routine-first group (n = 1698)

CAD-first group (n = 1698)

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P

Junior, n (%)

815 (48.00)

830 (48.88)

–

0.61

Patients, n (%)

8 (0.98)

26 (3.13)

3.58 (1.63–7.87)

0.0012

Lesions, n

8 (0.98)

27 (3.25)

–

–

Midlevel, n (%)

572 (33.69)

574 (33.80)

–

0.94

Patients, n (%)

7 (1.22)

16 (2.79)

2.28 (0.94–5.49)

0.09

Lesions, n

9 (1.57)

17 (2.96)

–

–

Senior, n (%)

311 (18.32)

294 (17.31)

–

0.45

Patients, n (%)

12 (3.86)

11 (3.74)

0.97 (0.43–2.16)

1

Lesions, n

12 (3.86)

13 (4.42)

–

–

  1. Data are n (%).
  2. CAD computer-aided detection.