Fig. 7: Summary of and confidence in cumulative evidence for the efficacy of d-Health interventions on step counts, MVPA, sedentary or sitting time, and weights in RCTs included in meta-analysis.
From: An umbrella review of efficacy of digital health interventions for workers
Indirectness, risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision were rated as no serious (green), serious (yellow), or very serious (red). Publication bias was rated as unlikely (green), likely (yellow), and very likely (red). Confidence in cumulative evidence begins at high and then addresses five domains that possibly rate down the confidence in cumulative evidence from high to very low. C control, I intervention, NA not applicable, O outcome, P population.
