Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Present and future limits to climate change adaptation

Abstract

Sustainable economic development and resilience to climate change impacts require human adaptation to a warming climate. It is possible that rising costs of climate change will provide incentives to increase adaptation actions in the future. This Perspective argues, by contrast, that adaptation to the costs of global warming is likely to be ineffective. Empirical evidence suggests that current adaptations are generally limited, and climate change is likely to undermine adaptive capacity, making intensification of the costs of warming as likely as adaptation to them. Climate adaptation will require difficult political action and is not an inevitable consequence of climate damages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematics of income- and exposure-based adaptation.
Fig. 2: Shifts in the damage function over time.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carleton, T. A. & Hsiang, S. M. Social and economic impacts of climate. Science 353, aad9837 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GAR Special Report 2023: Mapping Resilience for the Sustainable Development Goals (UNDRR, 2023).

  3. Moller, V. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2897–2930 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  4. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Neill, B. C. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2411–2538 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  6. Dell, M., Jones, B. F. & Olken, B. A. What do we learn from the weather? The new climate–economy literature. J. Econ. Literature 52, 740–798 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsiang, S. Climate econometrics. Annu. Rev. Res. Econ. 8, 43–75 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barreca, A., Clay, K., Deschenes, O., Greenstone, M. & Shapiro, J. S. Adapting to climate change: the remarkable decline in the US temperature–mortality relationship over the twentieth century. J. Polit. Econ. 124, 105–159 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carleton, T. et al. Valuing the global mortality consequences of climate change accounting for adaptation costs and benefits. Q. J. Econ. 137, 2037–2105 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlenker, W. & Roberts, M. J. Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to US crop yields under climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15594–15598 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Callahan, C. W. & Mankin, J. S. Globally unequal effect of extreme heat on economic growth. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd3726 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsiang, S. M. & Jina, A. S. The Causal Effect of Environmental Catastrophe on Long-Run Economic Growth: Evidence from 6,700 Cyclones (NBER, 2014).

  13. Callahan, C. W. & Mankin, J. S. Persistent effect of El Niño on global economic growth. Science 380, 1064–1069 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kotz, M., Levermann, A. & Wenz, L. The effect of rainfall changes on economic production. Nature 601, 223–227 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527, 235–239 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rode, A. et al. Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption. Nature 598, 308–314 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore, F. C. & Diaz, D. B. Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 127 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deryugina, T. & Hsiang, S. The Marginal Product of Climate (NBER, 2017).

  19. Schelling, T. C. Anticipating climate change: implications for welfare and policy. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 26, 6–35 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schelling, T. C. Some economics of global warming. Am. Econ. Rev. 82, 1–14 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Diaz, D. & Moore, F. Quantifying the economic risks of climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 774–782 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cruz, J.-L. & Rossi-Hansberg, E. The economic geography of global warming. Rev. Econ. Stud. 91, 899–939 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahn, M. E. Adapting to Climate Change: Markets and the Management of an Uncertain Future (Yale University Press, 2021).

  24. Ara Begum, R. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.O. et al.) 121–196 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  25. Burke, M. & Emerick, K. Adaptation to climate change: evidence from US agriculture. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 8, 106–140 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. WMO Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses from Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970–2019) (WMO, 2021).

  27. Kahn, M. E. The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 87, 271–284 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Birkmann, J. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 1171–1274 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  29. Barnes, M. L. et al. Social determinants of adaptive and transformative responses to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 823–828 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mortreux, C. & Barnett, J. Adaptive capacity: exploring the research frontier. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 8, e467 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Butler, E. E. & Huybers, P. Adaptation of US maize to temperature variations. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 68–72 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moscona, J. & Sastry, K. A. Does directed innovation mitigate climate damage? Evidence from US agriculture. Q. J. Econ. 138, 637–701 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lobell, D. B. et al. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the US Midwest. Science 344, 516–519 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hsiang, S. M. & Narita, D. Adaptation to cyclone risk: evidence from the global cross-section. Clim. Change Econ. 3, 1250011 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Geiger, T., Frieler, K. & Levermann, A. High-income does not protect against hurricane losses. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 084012 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dell, M., Jones, B. F. & Olken, B. A. Temperature shocks and economic growth: evidence from the last half century. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 4, 66–95 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Diffenbaugh, N. S., Davenport, F. V. & Burke, M. Historical warming has increased US crop insurance losses. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 084025 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Davenport, F. V., Burke, M. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Contribution of historical precipitation change to US flood damages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017524118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dow, K. et al. Limits to adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 305–307 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sherwood, S. C. & Huber, M. An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9552–9555 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lobell, D. B. et al. The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 497–501 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Clark, P. U. et al. Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 360–369 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Adger, W. N. & Barnett, J. Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change. Environ. Plan. A 41, 2800–2805 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Repetto, R. The Climate Crisis and the Adaptation Myth (Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 2008).

  45. Gourevitch, J. D. et al. Unpriced climate risk and the potential consequences of overvaluation in US housing markets. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 250–257 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jacobson, L. Americans are fleeing climate change—here’s where they can go. CNBC (21 April 2022).

  47. Condon, M. Climate services: the business of physical risk. Ariz. St. L. J. 55, 147–209 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mankin, J. S. The people have a right to climate data. New York Times (2024).

  49. Too Little, Too Slow: Climate Adaptation Failure Puts World at Risk (UNEP, 2022).

  50. Garschagen, M. & Doshi, D. Does funds-based adaptation finance reach the most vulnerable countries? Glob. Environ. Change 73, 102450 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Garcia, A. & Tschakert, P. Intersectional subjectivities and climate change adaptation: an attentive analytical approach for examining power, emancipatory processes, and transformation. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 47, 651–665 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Serdeczny, O. et al. Climatic risks to adaptive capacity. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 29, 10 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Andrijevic, M., Byers, E., Mastrucci, A., Smits, J. & Fuss, S. Future cooling gap in shared socioeconomic pathways. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 094053 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Auffhammer, M., Baylis, P. & Hausman, C. H. Climate change is projected to have severe impacts on the frequency and intensity of peak electricity demand across the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1886–1891 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Barreca, A., Park, R. J. & Stainier, P. High temperatures and electricity disconnections for low-income homes in California. Nat. Energy 7, 1052–1064 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Van Vliet, M. T. et al. Vulnerability of US and European electricity supply to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 676–681 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stone, B. et al. How blackouts during heat waves amplify mortality and morbidity risk. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 8245–8255 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Feng, K., Ouyang, M. & Lin, N. Tropical cyclone–blackout–heatwave compound hazard resilience in a changing climate. Nat. Commun. 13, 4421 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Magnan, A. K., Anisimov, A. & Duvat, V. K. Strengthen climate adaptation research globally. Science 376, 1398–1400 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Baldos, U. L. C. & Hertel, T. W. The role of international trade in managing food security risks from climate change. Food Secur. 7, 275–290 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Anderson, W., Seager, R., Baethgen, W., Cane, M. & You, L. Synchronous crop failures and climate-forced production variability. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw1976 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Naylor, R. L. & Ray, D. K. Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6644–6649 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. McLeman, R. International migration and climate adaptation in an era of hardening borders. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 911–918 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Benveniste, H., Oppenheimer, M. & Fleurbaey, M. Climate change increases resource-constrained international immobility. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 634–641 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Campbell-Staton, S. C. et al. Physiological costs of undocumented human migration across the southern United States border. Science 374, 1496–1500 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Cappelli, F., Costantini, V. & Consoli, D. The trap of climate change-induced ‘natural’ disasters and inequality. Glob. Environ. Change 70, 102329 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Besley, T. & Persson, T. Why do developing countries tax so little? J. Econ. Perspect. 28, 99–120 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shope, R. Global climate change and infectious diseases. Environ. Health Perspect. 96, 171–174 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Mach, K. J. et al. Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict. Nature 571, 193–197 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Millward-Hopkins, J. Why the impacts of climate change may make us less likely to reduce emissions. Glob. Sustain. 5, e21 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. White, R. Environmental insecurity and fortress mentality. Int. Affairs 90, 835–851 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Burke, M. Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9808–9813 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Carr, R. et al. Climate change to exacerbate the burden of water collection on women’s welfare globally. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 700–706 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Jeil, E. B., Abass, K. & Ganle, J. K. “We are free when water is available”: gendered livelihood implications of sporadic water supply in northern Ghana. Local Environ. 25, 320–335 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Hadachek, J., Bruno, E. M., Hagerty, N. & Jessoe, K. External Costs of Climate Adaptation: Groundwater Depletion and Drinking Water (2024).

  76. Abajian, A., Cole, C., Jack, B., Meng, K. & Visser, M. Dodging Day Zero: Drought, Adaptation, and Inequality in Cape Town (2024).

  77. Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R. & Wilbanks, T. J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7156–7161 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Miller, T. Storming the Wall: Climate Change, Migration, and Homeland Security (City Lights Books, 2017).

  79. Andrijevic, M. et al. Towards scenario representation of adaptive capacity for global climate change assessments. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 778–787 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Buhaug, H. & Vestby, J. On growth projections in the shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob. Environ. Polit. 19, 118–132 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Moore, F. C. et al. Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system. Nature 603, 103–111 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Tavoni, M. et al. Economic quantification of loss and damage funding needs. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 411–413 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank J. S. Mankin and C. E. Kernan for helpful discussions. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship no. 1840344.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher W. Callahan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks William Adger, Joel Millward-Hopkins and Leonie Wenz for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callahan, C.W. Present and future limits to climate change adaptation. Nat Sustain 8, 336–342 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01519-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01519-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing