Fig. 5: Comparison of percentage miscounting across all available microscope and magnifications. | Communications Biology

Fig. 5: Comparison of percentage miscounting across all available microscope and magnifications.

From: A computational approach to quantifying miscounting of radiation-induced double-strand break immunofluorescent foci

Fig. 5

Voxel size has been used as the descriptor of each microscope and is presented on a log axis. a are the results when using a Ku/DNA-PKcs marker. b are the results when using an γ-H2AX marker. Error bars are given as the standard error in the mean for the 1200 microscope images per point (200 cells and 6 time points). Error bars correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range in either direction. All microscope images are at a 2 Gy dose.

Back to article page