Fig. 2: Structural covariance gradient patterns.
From: Anterior-posterior systematic deficits of cortical thickness in early-onset schizophrenia

A Covariance gradient maps in TD and EOS. In the right density map, green boxes represent gradient scores of EOS patients and gray boxes represent TD controls, which suggested compressed gradient axis in EOS than TD (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; D400 = 0.13, p = 0.002). B Network distributions. For each group, the continuous density maps of gradient scores were separately plotted for each network. Group differences between EOS and TD were tested by using paired t-tests [False discovery rate (FDR) corrections, qFDR < 0.05]. VIS visual network, SMN sensorimotor network, DAN dorsal attention network, VAN ventral attention network, LMB limbic network, FPN frontoparietal network, DMN default mode network. C The 10-binned gradient axis. We computed bin-level gradient scores according to the 10-binned normative gradient mask and tested group differences by using paired t-tests (FDR corrected, p < 0.05).