Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Multilayered regulation of GluK3 kainate receptors is mediated by Neto subunits and zinc
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 February 2026

Multilayered regulation of GluK3 kainate receptors is mediated by Neto subunits and zinc

  • Rajesh Vinnakota1,2,
  • Bhavya K. Dawath1,2,
  • Anshul Assaiya  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-82173,
  • Suparna Bhar  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-8651-60933 &
  • …
  • Janesh Kumar  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-37881,2 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 731 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biophysics
  • Molecular neuroscience

Abstract

Kainate receptors (KARs), a distinct subfamily of ionotropic glutamate receptors, are critical modulators of synaptic transmission and network excitability. Their function is intricately regulated by auxiliary subunits and endogenous ions. The GluK3 subunit, in particular, exhibits unique gating and modulatory properties; however, the interplay between its known regulators, the Neto auxiliary proteins, and synaptic zinc remains poorly understood. We reveal a multi-layered regulatory system governing the function of GluK3. Using whole-cell electrophysiology, we demonstrate that the auxiliary subunits Neto1 and Neto2 differentially regulate the gating kinetics of GluK3. While both proteins markedly slow receptor desensitization and relieve the intrinsic polyamine block, they exert opposing effects on the rate of recovery from desensitization, with Neto1 accelerating and Neto2 decelerating recovery, suggesting distinct mechanisms for tuning synaptic fidelity. Crucially, we show that Neto proteins uniquely reshape the potentiation of GluK3 currents by zinc. Neto2, in particular, acts synergistically with zinc to produce a profound facilitation of peak currents. To dissect these regulatory pathways, we utilized a GluK3 (D759G) mutant, which ablates the LBD dimer interface zinc-binding site. This mutation unmasked a secondary, inhibitory zinc-binding site, revealing a previously unknown layer of modulation. While the (D759G) mutant preserved the fundamental modulatory actions of Neto proteins, the Neto isoforms differentially regulated this previously unidentified revealed inhibitory zinc effect. Cryo-electron microscopy confirms that the (D759G) mutation promotes a more compact arrangement of the ligand-binding domain (LBD), consistent with its stabilizing effect on gating. Together, these findings establish a distinct framework for understanding KAR function, where auxiliary subunits and ionic modulators converge to create a highly tunable signaling complex essential for synaptic plasticity.

Similar content being viewed by others

Activation of kainate receptor GluK2–Neto2 complex

Article Open access 22 August 2025

Kainate receptor modulation by NETO2

Article 22 September 2021

Trapping of spermine, Kukoamine A, and polyamine toxin blockers in GluK2 kainate receptor channels

Article Open access 26 November 2024

Data availability

The cryo-EM density reconstruction and final model for the GluK3 D759G mutant receptor complex with UBP310 and spermine are deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (accession codes EMD-32032) and the Protein Data Bank (accession codes 7VM2). All other data supporting the key findings of this study are included in the article and its Supplementary Information files or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data for all graphs are provided in the Supplementary Data.

References

  1. Hansen, K. B. et al. Structure, function, and pharmacology of glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 73, 1469–1658 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huettner, J. E. Kainate receptors and synaptic transmission. Prog. Neurobiol. 70, 387–407 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lerma, J. Roles and rules of kainate receptors in synaptic transmission. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 481–495 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinheiro, P. & Mulle, C. Kainate receptors. Kainate Recept. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-006-0265-6 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pinheiro, P. S. et al. GluR7 is an essential subunit of presynaptic kainate autoreceptors at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12181–12186 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sihra, T. S. & Rodríguez-Moreno, A. Presynaptic kainate receptor-mediated bidirectional modulatory actions: mechanisms. Neurochem. Int. 62, 982–987 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sihra, T. S., Flores, G. & Rodríguez-Moreno, A. Kainate receptors: multiple roles in neuronal plasticity. Neuroscientist 20, 29–43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jane, D. E., Lodge, D. & Collingridge, G. L. Kainate receptors: pharmacology, function and therapeutic potential. Neuropharmacology 56, 90–113 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lerma, J., Marques, J. M., Neurociencias, I. D. & Alicante, S. J. D. Review kainate receptors in health and disease. Neuron 80, 292–311 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Molnár, E. Kainate receptors in brain function and disorders. Neuropharmacology 207, 108946 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Negrete-Díaz, J. V., Falcón-Moya, R. & Rodríguez-Moreno, A. Kainate receptors: from synaptic activity to disease. FEBS J. 289, 5074–5088 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hollmann, M. & Heinemann, S. Cloned glutamate receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 31–108 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher, E. J. & Lodge, D. New developments in the molecular pharmacology of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate and kainate receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 70, 65–89 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bettler, B. et al. Cloning of a novel glutamate receptor subunit, GluR5: expression in the nervous system during development. Neuron 5, 583–595 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lomeli, H. et al. High-affinity kainate a domoate receptors in rat brain. FEBS Lett. 307, 139–143 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perrais, D., Coussen, F. & Mulle, C. Atypical functional properties of GluK3-containing kainate receptors. J. Neurosci. 29, 15499–15510 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iida, I. et al. Behavioral analysis of kainate receptor KO mice and the role of GluK3 subunit in anxiety. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–17 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tomita, S., Castillo, P. E., Castillo, P. E. & Purpura, D. P. Neto1 and Neto2: auxiliary subunits that determine key properties of native kainate receptors. J. Physiol. 590, 2217–2223 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, W. et al. A transmembrane accessory subunit that modulates kainate-type glutamate receptors. Neuron 61, 385–396 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Copits, B. A., Robbins, J. S., Frausto, S. & Swanson, G. T. Synaptic targeting and functional modulation of GluK1 kainate receptors by the auxiliary neuropilin and tolloid-like (NETO) Proteins. J. Neurosci. 31, 7334–7340 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Straub, C. et al. Distinct functions of kainate receptors in the brain are determined by the auxiliary subunit Neto1. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 866–873 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Straub, C., Zhang, W. & Howe, J. R. Neto2 modulation of kainate receptors with different subunit compositions. J. Neurosci. 31, 8078–8082 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, M. et al. Neto1 is an auxiliary subunit of native synaptic kainate receptors. J. Neurosci. 31, 10009 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher, J. L. & Mott, D. D. The auxiliary subunits Neto1 and Neto2 reduce voltage-dependent inhibition of recombinant kainate receptors. J. Neurosci. 32, 12928–12933 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Copits, B. A. & Swanson, G. T. Dancing partners at the synapse: auxiliary subunits that shape kainate receptor function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 675–686 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vinnakota, R. et al. Role of Neto1 extracellular domain in modulation of kainate receptors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 192, 525–536 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michishita, M. et al. A novel gene, Btcl1, encoding CUB and LDLa domains is expressed in restricted areas of mouse brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 306, 680–686 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michishita, M. et al. Expression of Btcl2, a novel member of Btcl gene family, during development of the central nervous system. Dev. Brain Res. 153, 135–142 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wenzel, H. J., Cole, T. B., Born, D. E., Schwartzkroin, P. A. & Palmiter, R. D. Ultrastructural localization of zinc transporter-3 (ZnT-3) to synaptic vesicle membranes within mossy fiber boutons in the hippocampus of mouse and monkey. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12676–12681 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krall, R. F., Tzounopoulos, T. & Aizenman, E. The function and regulation of zinc in the brain. Neuroscience 457, 235–258 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Benarroch, E. What are the functions of zinc in the nervous system? Neurology 101, 714–720 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Veran, J. et al. Zinc potentiates GluK3 glutamate receptor function by stabilizing the ligand binding domain dimer interface. Neuron. 76, 565–578 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bettler, B. et al. Cloning of a putative glutamate receptor: a low affinity kainate-binding subunit. Neuron. 8, 257–265 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paoletti, P., Vergnano, A. M., Barbour, B. & Casado, M. Zinc at glutamatergic synapses. Neuroscience 158, 126–136 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Perrais, D., Pinheiro, P. S., Jane, D. E. & Mulle, C. Antagonism of recombinant and native GluK3-containing kainate receptors. Neuropharmacology 56, 131–140 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kalappa, B. I., Anderson, C. T., Goldberg, J. M., Lippard, S. J. & Tzounopoulos, T. AMPA receptor inhibition by synaptically released zinc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15749–15754 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. He, L. et al. Kainate receptor modulation by NETO2. Nature 599, 325–329 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kumari, J., Vinnakota, R. & Kumar, J. Structural and functional insights into GluK3-kainate receptor desensitization and recovery. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–16 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kumari, J. et al. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Structural dynamics of the GluK3-kainate receptor neurotransmitter binding domains revealed by cryo-EM. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 149, 1051–1058 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fisher, J. L., Mott, D. D., Fisher, J. L. & Mott, D. D. Modulation of homomeric and heteromeric kainate receptors by the auxiliary subunit Neto1. J. Physiol. 591, 4711–4724 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gangwar, S. P., Yelshanskaya, M. V., Yen, L. Y., Newton, T. P. & Sobolevsky, A. I. Activation of kainate receptor GluK2–Neto2 complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 32, 2176–2184 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou, C., Segura-Covarrubias, G. & Tajima, N. Structural insights into kainate receptor desensitization. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.27.645769 (2025).

  43. Segura-Covarrubias, G., Zhou, C., Bogdanović, N., Zhang, L. & Tajima, N. Structural basis of GluK2 kainate receptor activation by a partial agonist. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-025-01566-w (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Takeda, A., Hirate, M., Tamano, H., Nisibaba, D. & Oku, N. Susceptibility to kainate-induced seizures under dietary zinc deficiency. J. Neurochem. 85, 1575–1580 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Theleritis, C. et al. Zinc in psychosis (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 32, 201 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Valbuena, S. & Lerma, J. Losing balance: Kainate receptors and psychiatric disorders comorbidities. Neuropharmacology 191, 108558 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

  50. Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera - A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the DBT–Wellcome Trust India Alliance (IA/S/21/2/505937). J.K. is a Senior Fellow of the DBT–Wellcome Trust India Alliance. B.K.D. acknowledges support from the University Grants Commission (UGC) in the form of a Senior Research Fellowship. S.B. acknowledges the National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, for a Senior Research Fellowship. We thank M. L. Mayer for providing GluK3 wild-type constructs used for construct optimization and mutational studies, and E. Gouaux for the pEGBacMam vector. We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for access to beamline CM01 and the cryo-electron microscopy facility at CSIR–CCMB for data collection. We thank the facility staff for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Membrane Protein Biology Group, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

    Rajesh Vinnakota, Bhavya K. Dawath & Janesh Kumar

  2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India

    Rajesh Vinnakota, Bhavya K. Dawath & Janesh Kumar

  3. Laboratory of Membrane Protein Biology, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, Maharashtra, India

    Anshul Assaiya & Suparna Bhar

Authors
  1. Rajesh Vinnakota
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bhavya K. Dawath
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anshul Assaiya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Suparna Bhar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Janesh Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.V. performed electrophysiology experiments. B.K.D. and A.A. generated GluK3 mutant constructs, expressed and purified proteins, conducted molecular biology and biochemical experiments, and processed cryo-EM data. S.B. performed pull-down assays. J.K. conceived and supervised the project. R.V., B.K.D., S.B., A.A., and J.K. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janesh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.K. is an Editorial Board Member for Communications Biology, but was not involved in the editorial review of, nor the decision to publish this article. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary handling editors: Laura Rodriguez Perez. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinnakota, R., Dawath, B.K., Assaiya, A. et al. Multilayered regulation of GluK3 kainate receptors is mediated by Neto subunits and zinc. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09707-7

Download citation

  • Received: 30 October 2025

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 12 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09707-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing