Fig. 6: Model for two resistance minima branches arising from one equilibrium FQHE state under current bias. | Communications Physics

Fig. 6: Model for two resistance minima branches arising from one equilibrium FQHE state under current bias.

From: Non-equilibrium excited-state fractionally quantized Hall effects observed via current bias spectroscopy

Fig. 6

Illustrations (aj) show the source (blue), a barrier, the Landau level (LL) (gray), a second barrier, and the drain (blue). The source and drain electrochemical potentials are μS and μD, respectively. The LL-width is LLW. The highest occupied state is EF. The LL-filling factor (green) is ν. The violet dotted line shows ν decreasing with increasing magnetic field B. The orange band denotes a mobility gap/localized band at ν = p/q. Panels (a, c, e, g, i) and (b, d, f, h, j) consider μS and/or μD coincidence with the mobility gap for positive and negative currents, respectively. a, b Canonical FQHE is observed at ν = p/q with IDC = 0, where EF coincides with mobility gap, μS, and μD. This includes “forbidden entry” and “forbidden exit” (red arrows with “x”) at μS and μD. c At B3 > B2, the EF falls below the mobility gap. However, with IDC = +I0, the finite bias helps to bring μD back into coincidence with the mobility gap, which produces just an observable resistance minimum, as entry at μD becomes forbidden. d With IDC = −I0, the gap coincides now with μS at B3 > B2, then entry is forbidden, and this again produces a resistance minimum. e At B1 < B2, EF rises above the mobility gap. Yet, μS can coincide with the gap with IDC = +I0 and exit becomes forbidden. f With IDC = −I0, exit is again forbidden as the gap coincides with μD. The (g) and (h) cases are analogous to the (c) and (d) forbidden entry cases, respectively, except the bias currents are twice larger in magnitude, so the coincidence occurs at B4 > B2. Similarly, the (i) and (j) cases are analogous to the (e) and (f) forbidden exit cases. k A IDC vs. B plot conveys the results. Note the appearance of positively and negatively sloped lines for the resistance minima and their intersection at IDC = 0, as in Fig. 3.

Back to article page