There is much to be gained from interdisciplinary efforts to tackle complex psychological notions such as ‘theory of mind’. However, careful and consistent communication is essential when comparing artificial and biological intelligence, say Henry Shevlin and Marta Halina.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Human Autonomy at Risk? An Analysis of the Challenges from AI
Minds and Machines Open Access 24 June 2024
-
The mechanisms of AI hype and its planetary and social costs
AI and Ethics Open Access 02 April 2024
-
Visual behavior modelling for robotic theory of mind
Scientific Reports Open Access 11 January 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Simon, H. A. Cogn. Sci. 4, 33–46 (1980).
Racanière, S. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5690–5701 (NIPS, 2017).
Kim, Y. et al. Science 360, 998–1003 (2018).
Rabinowitz, N. C. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07740 (2018).
Shylaja, K., Vijayakumar, M., Prasad, E. V. & Davis, D. N. Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst. 9, 20–42 (2017).
Abate, T. Stanford News https://news.stanford.edu/2018/05/31/artificial-nerve-system-gives-prosthetic-devices-robots-sense-touch (31 May 2018).
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 515–526 (1978).
Lurz, R. W. Mindreading Animals: The Debate over What Animals Know about Other Minds (MIT Press, 2011).
Karg, K., Schmelz, M., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Animal Behav. 105, 211–221 (2015).
Halina, M. Philos. Sci. 82, 473–490 (2015).
Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Science 354, 110–114 (2016).
Heyes, C. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 1–2 (2017).
Görür, O. C., Rosman, B. S., Hoffman, G. & Albayrak, S. in 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (ACM, 2017).
Winfield, A. F. T. Front. Robot. AI 5, 75 (2018).
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C. & Botvinick, M. Neuron 95, 245–258 (2017).
Selbst, A. D. & Barocas, S. Fordham L. Rev. 87, 1085 (2018).
Schaafsma, S. M., Pfaff, D. W., Spunt, R. P. & Adolphs, R. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 65–72 (2015).
Hare, R. M. The Language of Morals (Oxford Univ. Press, 1952).
Kulkarni, T. D., Narasimhan, K., Saeedi, A. & Tenenbaum, J. in Advances on Neural Information Processing Systems 3675–3683 (NIPS, 2016).
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gershman, S. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 40, e253 (2017).
Elsayed, G. et al. in Advances on Neural Information Processing Systems 3914–3924 (NIPS, 2018).
Rajpurkar, P. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05225 (2017).
Godfrey-Smith, P. Other Minds: The Octopus and the Evolution of Intelligent Life (William Collins, 2016).
Ostojić, L., Shaw, R. C., Cheke, L. G. & Clayton, N. S. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4123–4128 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shevlin, H., Halina, M. Apply rich psychological terms in AI with care. Nat Mach Intell 1, 165–167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0039-y
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0039-y
This article is cited by
-
Bringing comparative cognition approaches to AI systems
Nature Reviews Psychology (2025)
-
A New Account of Pragmatic Understanding, Applied to the Case of AI-Assisted Science
Philosophical Studies (2025)
-
Who authors AI art? (And why does it matter?)
AI & SOCIETY (2025)
-
AI: artistic collaborator?
AI & SOCIETY (2025)
-
Discussions of machine versus living intelligence need more clarity
Nature Machine Intelligence (2024)