Extended Data Fig. 7: The recall, precision, and F1 score of SUNS were superior to that of other methods on a variety of datasets.
From: Segmentation of neurons from fluorescence calcium recordings beyond real time
a, Training on one ABO 275 μm video and testing on nine ABO 275 μm videos (each data point is the average over each set of nine test videos, n = 10); b, Training on ten ABO 275 μm videos and testing on ten ABO 175 μm videos (n = 10); c, Training on one Neurofinder video and testing on one paired Neurofinder video (n = 12); d, Training on three-quarters of one CaImAn video and testing on the remaining quarter of the same CaImAn video (n = 16). The F1 scores of SUNS were mostly significantly higher than the F1 scores of other methods (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, n.s. - not significant; two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test; error bars are s.d.). The gray dots represent the individual scores for each round of cross-validation.
