Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

A risk-based approach can guide safe cell line development and cell banking for scaled-up cultivated meat production

Abstract

For commercial viability, cultivated meats require scientifically informed approaches to identify and manage hazards and risks. Here we discuss food safety in the rapidly developing field of cultivated meat as it shifts from lab-based to commercial scales. We focus on what science-informed risk mitigation processes can be implemented from neighbouring fields. We case-study pre-market safety assessments from UPSIDE Foods, GOOD Meat and Vow Group using publicly available dossiers. Quality control and safety assurance practices need to be established and standardized for cell lines and food-grade cell banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eat Just Inc. gets approval in Singapore for lab-grown chicken. Food Safety News https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2020/12/eat-just-inc-gets-approval-in-singapore-for-lab-grown-chicken/ (2020).

  2. UPSIDE is approved for sale in the US! Here’s what you need to know. UPSIDE Foods https://upsidefoods.com/blog/upside-is-approved-for-sale-in-the-us-heres-what-you-need-to-know (2023).

  3. GOOD Meat gets full approval in the U.S. for cultivated meat. GOOD Meat https://www.goodmeat.co/all-news/good-meat-gets-full-approval-in-the-us-for-cultivated-meat (2023).

  4. Aleph Farms granted world’s first regulatory approval for cultivated beef. Aleph Farms https://aleph-farms.com/journals/aleph-farms-granted-worlds-first-regulatory-approval-for-cultivated-beef/ (2024).

  5. Requirements for the Safety Assessment of Novel Foods and Novel Food Ingredients (SFA, 2023); https://www.sfa.gov.sg/docs/default-source/regulatory-standards-frameworks-and-guidelines/requirements-for-the-safety-assessment-of-novel-foods-and-novel-food-ingredients.pdf

  6. Food Act 2014 (MPI, 2023); https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2014/0032/159.0/DLM2995811.html

  7. Coecke, S. et al. Guidance on good cell culture practice: a report of the second ECVAM task force on good cell culture practice. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33, 261–287 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallman, W. K., Hallman, W. K. & Hallman, E. E. Cell-based, cell-cultured, cell-cultivated, cultured, or cultivated. What is the best name for meat, poultry, and seafood made directly from the cells of animals? npj Sci. Food 7, 62 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Premarket Notice for Integral Tissue Cultured Poultry Meat (UPSIDE Foods, 2021); https://www.fda.gov/media/163262/download

  10. Dossier in Support of the Safety of Good Meat Cultured Chicken as a Human Food Ingredient (GOOD Meat, 2022); https://www.fda.gov/media/166346/download

  11. Vow Cultured Quail: Novel Food Dossier Food Standards Australia New Zealand Update (Vow, 2023); https://consultations.foodstandards.gov.au/sas/a1269-cultured-quail-as-a-novel-food/user_uploads/application---cultured-quail-as-a-novel-food.docx.pdf

  12. Food Safety Aspects of Cell-Based Meats (FAO and WHO, 2023); https://doi.org/10.4060/cc4855en

  13. Valiant, W. G., Cai, K. & Vallone, P. M. A history of adventitious agent contamination and the current methods to detect and remove them from pharmaceutical products. Biologicals 80, 6–17 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McNamara, E. & Bomkamp, C. Cultivated meat as a tool for fighting antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Food 3, 791–794 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Whaley, D. et al. Cryopreservation: an overview of principles and cell-specific considerations. Cell Transplant. 30, 0963689721999617 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ladics, G. S. et al. Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 60, 46–53 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ong, K. J. et al. Food safety considerations and research priorities for the cultured meat and seafood industry. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20, 5421–5448 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Peppou, G. Vow is officially on market. Medium https://medium.com/vow-food/vow-is-officially-on-market-f2b3028abb5e (2024).

  19. Animal Products Regulations 2021 (MPI, 2021); https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2021/0400/latest/LMS520972.html

  20. Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing (MPI, 2023). https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/50182-Animal-Products-Notice-Production-Supply-and-Processing

  21. Hepburn, P. et al. The application of post-market monitoring to novel foods. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, 9–33 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on Novel Foods, Amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001 (European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2015); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R2283

  23. Review of Novel Food Standard (FSANZ, 2007); https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/sites/default/files/food-standards-code/proposals/Documents/P291%20Novel%20Food%20Review%20FAR%20FINAL.pdf

  24. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Animal Cell Cultures as Substrates for the Manufacture of Biological Medicinal Products and for the Characterization of Cell Banks WHO Technical Report Series No. 978 (WHO, 2010); https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/biologicals/documents/trs_978_annex_3.pdf?sfvrsn=fe61af77_3&download=true

  25. Guidance for Industry: Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2010); https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download

  26. Singh, J. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 6, 185–187 (2025).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ye, J., Liu, Z. & Pollard, D. in ICH Quality Guidelines: An Implementation Guide (eds Teasdale, A. et al.) 337–344 (John Wiley & Sons, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118971147.ch11

  28. Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin Q5A(R1) (International Conference On Harmonisation, 1999); https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q5A%28R1%29%20Guideline_0.pdf

  29. Horbach, S. P. J. M. & Halffman, W. The ghosts of HeLa: how cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature. PLoS ONE 12, e0186281 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cell-Based Food: Its Safety and its Future Role (FAO, 2023); https://doi.org/10.4060/cc6967en

  31. Ong, K. J. et al. Cultured meat safety research priorities: regulatory and governmental perspectives. Foods 12, 2645 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Cell-Based Food and Precision FermentationProducts, Safety and the Future Role (FAO, 2024); https://doi.org/10.4060/cd0311en

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Business and Innovation Smart Ideas grant (Catalyst: Strategic – New Zealand-Singapore Future Foods Research programme), Marsden Fund managed by Royal Society Te Apārangi, A*STAR Biomedical Research Council, A*STAR Bioprocessing Technology Institute, National Research Foundation Singapore, A*STAR AME Programmatic Fund, Singapore Food Agency, Good Food Institution Research Program, IAF, SMART CAMP, WisDM, Mechanobiology Institute of Singapore, AGS, Biomolecular Interaction Centre and The Riddet Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.Z.B. and O.J.O. conceptualized the Perspective and wrote the original draft preparation. L.S.W.L., H.Z., S.K.N., A.J., H.J.F.T., A.W., L.J.D. and R.C.J.D provided feedback and edits. All authors contributed to editing and revising the paper. L.J.D., H.Y. and R.C.J.D. acquired research funding to allow this work to be carried out. All authors reviewed and approved the final paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renwick Charles Joseph Dobson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

O.J.O. and L.J.D. are co-founders, shareholders and employees of Opo Bio Limited, a cell line development company that specializes in high-quality cell lines for cultivated meat. H.Y. is the non-executive chairman, co-founder, and shareholder of Ants Innovate Pte Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Food thanks Craig Hedberg, Andreas Kurtz, Dhruv Raina and Jin Wang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennie, R.Z., Ogilvie, O.J., Loo, L.S.W. et al. A risk-based approach can guide safe cell line development and cell banking for scaled-up cultivated meat production. Nat Food 6, 25–30 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-01085-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-01085-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research